BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Academy of Management  - ECPv6.15.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.aom.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Academy of Management 
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19690427T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19691026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19700426T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19701025T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19710425T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19711031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19720430T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19721029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19730429T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19731028T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19740106T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19741027T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19750223T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19751026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19760425T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19761031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19770424T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19771030T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19780430T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19781029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19790429T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19791028T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19800427T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19801026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19810426T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19811025T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19820425T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19821031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19830424T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19831030T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19840429T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19841028T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19850428T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19851027T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19860427T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19861026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19870405T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19871025T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19880403T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19881030T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19890402T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19891029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19900401T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19901028T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19910407T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19911027T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19920405T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19921025T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19930404T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19931031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19940403T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19941030T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19950402T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19951029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19960407T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19961027T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19970406T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19971026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19980405T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19981025T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:19990404T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:19991031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20000402T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20001029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20010401T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20011028T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20020407T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20021027T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20030406T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20031026T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20040404T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20041031T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20050403T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20051030T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20060402T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20061029T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20070311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20071104T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20080309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20081102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20090308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20091101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20100314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20101107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20110313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20111106T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20120311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20121104T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20130310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20131103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20140309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20141102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20150308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20151101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20160313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20161106T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20170312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20171105T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20180311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20181104T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20190310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20191103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20200308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20201101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20210314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20211107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20220313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20230312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20231105T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific/Fiji
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1200
TZOFFSETTO:+1200
TZNAME:+12
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Vilnius
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260327T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260327T180000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260225T060844Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260225T060845Z
UID:10000012-1774602000-1774634400@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:Joint AMD\, AMLE\, AMP Paper Development Workshop\, Ontario\, Canada
DESCRIPTION:In-person Paper Development Workshop hosted by Ivey Business School\, Western University\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAcademy of Management Perspectives (AMP)\, Academy of Management Discoveries (AMD)\, and Academy of Management Learning and Education (AMLE) are pleased to partner with the Ivey Business School (Ivey) and Western University (Western) to host an in-person Paper Development Workshop (PDW)\, to be held on the London\, ON campus\, on Friday\, 27 March 2026\, from 9:00 – 17:00 local time\, followed by a reception. \n\n\n\nPDW attendees will meet members of the three editorial teams and participate in breakout sessions and plenaries that enhance understanding of how to publish in AMP\, AMD\, and AMLE. \n\n\n\nRegistrants are not required to submit a proposal to attend the PDW. However\, those who wish to obtain individualized feedback on their specific research idea must submit a proposal at the time of registration. Proposals must indicate the target journal (AMP\, AMD\, or AMLE) and contain 3-4 pages that clearly and concisely detail the research idea. Please carefully review the mission and author guidelines on your focal journal’s website and clearly specify in the proposal how your research fits within these guidelines. Applicants will receive notice of acceptance of proposals by no later than 6 March 2026. \n\n\n\nPlease note that participation in the workshop does not guarantee acceptance of the paper to AMP\, AMD\, or AMLE or special preference in the review process. \n\n\n\nRegistration Information\n\n\n\nThere is a nonrefundable US$50 registration fee. Payment must be completed by 11 March 2026 or registration will be cancelled. If a coauthor plans to attend\, each coauthor is required to register separately. \n\n\n\nTo attend\, please register no later than 27 February 2026.  \n\n\n\nPDW Timeline\n\n\n\n\nRegistration and Proposal Submission Deadline: 27 February 2026 (payment is not required at the time of registration)\n\n\n\nProposal Acceptance Decision: 6 March 2026\n\n\n\n\nAccommodation and Logistics\n\n\n\nBreakfast\, lunch\, coffee breaks\, and a closing reception on 27 March are included in the registration fee. Travel and accommodation\, if needed\, are not. Travel suggestions and reasonable hotel options will be provided to those who register. Any questions about accommodations or logistics should be directed to Oana Branzei\, cc-ing her faculty assistant Sara Musa. \n\n\n\nTentative Agenda\n\n\n\nWe have planned a full and exciting agenda\, as follows (subject to change): \n\n\n\n8:00-9:00Registration and Breakfast9:00-9:15Welcome by Dean Julian Birkinshaw9:15-9:30Agenda and Introductions9:30-10:30Opening PanelJournal overviews. AMP\, AMD & AMLE10:30-11:00Coffee Break11:00-12:30Morning Breakouts and PlenariesExperienced scholars with accepted proposals will be assigned to journal-specific breakout sessions to receive focused feedback. Other experienced scholars in attendance are encouraged to join a breakout session. Less experienced scholars should attend one of the following plenaries:Plenary 1a: A beginner’s guide to writing for AMPPlenary 1b: A beginner’s guide to writing for AMDPlenary 1c: A beginners guide to writing for AMLE                      12:30-13:30Lunch13:30-15:00Afternoon Breakouts and PlenariesLess experienced scholars with accepted proposals will be assigned to journal-specific breakout sessions to receive focused feedback. Other less-experienced scholars in attendance are encouraged to join a breakout session. Experienced scholars should attend one of the following plenaries:Plenary 2a: An advanced guide to writing for AMPPlenary 2b: An advanced guide to writing for AMDPlenary 2c: An advanced guide to writing for AMLE                      15:00-15:30Coffee Break15:30-17:00Closing PlenaryWhat research matters to managers and how can scholars and practitioners work together to provide it?17:00-18:00Reception\n\n\n\nWe look forward to seeing you and helping you to develop your work!
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/joint-amd-amle-amp-paper-development-workshop-ontario-canada/
CATEGORIES:Discoveries,Journal Workshops,Journals,Learning & Education,Perspectives
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/AMD-AMLE-AMR-Joint-Workshop-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20251208T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20251208T160000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T045352Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T045352Z
UID:10000046-1765184400-1765209600@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Paper Development Workshop\, Doha\, Qatar
DESCRIPTION:In-person Paper Development Workshop hosted by HEC Paris \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nEditorial Organization\n\n\n\n\nDiego M. Coraiola\n\n\n\nSimy Joy\n\n\n\n\nLocal Organizer\n\n\n\n\nPablo Martin de Hollan\n\n\n\n\nAbout AMLE\n\n\n\nAcademy of Management Learning & Education (AMLE) is part of the portfolio of journals published by the Academy of Management along with AMJ\, AMP\, AMP\, Annals\, and AMD. AMLE is rated as 4* in the UK AJG list and A* in the Australian Business Deans’ Council list of journals. \n\n\n\nAMLE publishes theory-driven studies on management learning\, management education\, or the business of business schools. For empirical papers\, this means that where the research sample is composed of learners\, they are higher education students in business school(s) or school(s) of management\, or they are managers learning in executive contexts. Where the sample is composed of faculty\, then they are situated within a business school(s) or school(s) of management.  \n\n\n\nRegistration\n\n\n\n\nThere is no registration fee\, but participants are responsible for arranging their own travel and accommodation. Registration\, submission of a short paper\, and commitment to attend are required for all participants wishing to attend both parts of the PDW. The places in Part 2 are limited and are allocated to the first 15 submissions that meet the requirements below.\n\n\n\nYou can still attend and participate if you do not have work to discuss in Part 2. Please let us know by 15 November 2025 if you wish to register without submitting work for Part 2.\n\n\n\n\nCatering\n\n\n\nRefreshments and lunch will be provided. HEC Paris\, Doha generously sponsored catering and lunch for a limited number of participants. \n\n\n\nRequirements\n\n\n\nShort papers (approximately 3\,000 words) that fit the aim and scope of AMLE. Prior editorials can serve as guideposts to clarify AMLE’s focus and content areas (Caza et al.\, 2024; Coraiola & Caza\, 2025; Hibbert\, in Rockmann et al.\, 2021; Hibbert et al.\, 2023; Lindebaum\, 2024; Vince and Hibbert\, 2018). \n\n\n\nWorkshop Structure\n\n\n\nThis workshop has two main parts: \n\n\n\n\nPart 1 comprises a general introduction to AMLE. The main focus is on writing manuscripts that advance our theoretical understanding of MLE phenomena for the research article and essay sections of the journal. This first part of the workshop is open to all interested participants\, including those who do not submit a short paper.\n\n\n\nPart 2 is focused on supporting and advising researchers on how to develop and refine their papers with submission to AMLE in mind. Those wishing to participate in Part 2 should note the requirements.\n\n\n\n\nApproximate schedule for the day: \n\n\n\n\n09:00–09:30 – Welcome reception \n\n\n\n09:30–10:30 – Introduction to AMLE and Q&A \n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 – Refreshments \n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 – Developing a theoretical contribution for AMLE \n\n\n\n11:45–12:00 – Coffee break \n\n\n\n12:00–13:30 – Roundtable discussion of submitted papers \n\n\n\n13:30–14:30 – Lunch \n\n\n\n14:30–16:00 – Continuation of roundtable discussion and Q&A \n\n\n\n\nSubmission\n\n\n\nYour submission must include: (1) a cover page with the author(s) name(s) and affiliation(s)\, three to four keywords\, and an email address for the lead author; and (2) your short paper (~3\,000 words). Please note that by submitting your paper\, you \n\n\n\n\nAgree to your paper being discussed in a small group with other participants\, as arranged by the workshop facilitators\, and be willing and able to provide a short (5-minute maximum) overview of your paper to others in the discussion group.\n\n\n\nCommit to attending the whole workshop if your submission is accepted.\n\n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nCaza\, A.\, Harley\, B.\, Coraiola\, D. M.\, Lindebaum\, D.\, & Moser\, C. 2024. What Is a Contribution and How Can You Make One at AMLE? Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(4): 523–528. \n\n\n\nCoraiola\, D. M. & Caza\, A. 2025. Publishing Impactful Literature Reviews in AMLE. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 24(1): 9–17. \n\n\n\nHibbert P\, Caza A\, Coraiola DM\, et al. 2023. Why Be an Editor? Academy of Management Learning & Education. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2023.0435. \n\n\n\nLindebaum D. 2024. Management Learning and Education as “Big Picture” Social Science. Academy of Management Learning & Education 23(1): 1–7. \n\n\n\nRockmann K.\, Bunderson J.S.\, Leana C.R.\, et al. 2021. Publishing in the Academy of Management Journals. Academy of Management Learning & Education 20(2): 117–126. \n\n\n\nVince\, R.\, and Hibbert\, P. 2018. From the AMLE Editorial Team: Disciplined Provocation: Writing Essays for AMLE. Academy of Management Learning & Education 17(4): 397–400.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-paper-development-workshop-doha-qatar/
CATEGORIES:Event Calendar,Journal Workshops,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/amle_pdw.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251201T000000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251201T000000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T045354Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T045354Z
UID:10000050-1764547200-1764547200@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Virtual Paper Development Workshop on Special Section: Learning to Hope In and Through Management Learning & Education
DESCRIPTION:Virtual Paper Development Workshop on AMLE Special Section: Learning to Hope In and Through Management Learning & Education\n\n\n\nLed By\n\n\n\n\nDirk Lindebaum\, Editor AMLE\n\n\n\nAMLE Associate Editors: Katrin Muelfeld\, Laura Colombo\, Stuart Middleton\, Todd Bridgman\, Diego M. Coraiola\n\n\n\n\nAbout the Workshop\n\n\n\nThis virtual Paper Development Workshop (PDW) is for interested authors to receive feedback on their ideas on the call for papers to the AMLE Special Section: Learning to Hope In and Through Management Learning & Education. While we encourage interested contributors to participate in this PDW\, participation is not a prerequisite for\, or a guarantee of\, eventual acceptance for the special section. \n\n\n\nWorkshop Requirements\n\n\n\nThose interested in participating in the virtual workshop should submit either (a) a full draft paper or (b) a 4\,000–5\,000 word proposal (including an indication of the structure of the proposed paper\, its aims\, key arguments\, theoretical contribution to and practical implications for AMLE) by the 10th of November 2025.  \n\n\n\nWorkshop Structure\n\n\n\nThis workshop will consists of small groups and random assignments.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-virtual-paper-development-workshop-on-special-section-learning-to-hope-in-and-through-management-learning-education/
CATEGORIES:Event Calendar,Journal Workshops,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/amle_pdw.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Pacific/Fiji:20251106T090000
DTEND;TZID=Pacific/Fiji:20251106T163000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T045351Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T045351Z
UID:10000044-1762419600-1762446600@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Paper Development Workshop\, Wellington\, New Zealand
DESCRIPTION:Register and Submit Here\n\n\n\n\nLed By\n\n\n\n\nTodd Bridgman: Associate Editor AMLE\, Victoria University of Wellington\n\n\n\nBill Harley: Associate Editor AMLE\, University of Melbourne\n\n\n\nStuart Middleton: Associate Editor AMLE\, University of Queensland\n\n\n\n\nLocal Organizer\n\n\n\n\nTodd Bridgman\n\n\n\n\nAbout AMLE\n\n\n\nAcademy of Management Learning & Education (AMLE) is rated A* in the Australian Business Deans’ Council list of journals and 4* in the UK CABS list. The journal’s main emphasis is on theoretical debates about management learning and education in all types of settings—schools and universities as well as businesses and public and nonprofit organizations. Additionally\, AMLE publishes work that addresses critical theoretical debates about “the business of business schools\,” including the careers of management educators. \n\n\n\nWorkshop Overview\n\n\n\nThis workshop has two main parts. Refreshments and lunch will be provided. \n\n\n\nPart 1 (preparation required): comprises a general introduction to AMLE\, touching on its overlaps with other key journals in the field. The session is also focused on supporting and advising researchers\, with current work-in-progress\, how to develop and refine their papers with submission to AMLE in mind. Those wishing to participate in Part 1 should note the requirements listed below. \n\n\n\nPart 2 (no preparation required): The main focus is on writing manuscripts that advance our theoretical understanding about AMLE phenomena for the research article and essay sections of the journal. The second part of the workshop is open to all interested participants. \n\n\n\nPart 1 Workshop Schedule (preparation required) \n\n\n\n9:00-9:30        Arrival and refreshments9:30-10:30      AMLE overview\, and Q&A10:30-10:45    Refreshments10:45-12:30    Small group discussion of submissions\, with individual advice from the facilitators12:30-13:30    Lunch \n\n\n\nPart 2 Workshop Schedule (no preparation required) \n\n\n\n13:30-14:30   Writing Essays for AMLE (Bill)14:30-15:30   Making a Theoretical Contribution (Todd and Stuart)15:30-15:45   Refreshments15:45-16:30   follow-on meetings with any workshop participants who have remained and would like further advice on their work. \n\n\n\nPart 1 Requirements\n\n\n\nParticipants in part one must: \n\n\n\n\nHave either an extended abstract (5 pages) or a full paper that you would like to develop through constructive critique and that fits with AMLE’s focus and content areas. Previous “From the Editors” articles can serve as guideposts to clarify AMLE’s focus and content areas (Coraiola & Caza\, 2025; Foster\, 2018; Hibbert et al.\, 2021; Lindebaum\, 2023; Hibbert\, in Rockmann et al.\, 2021).\n\n\n\nSubmit the submission in Word or PDF format\, no later than 30 September 2025. Your submission must have a cover page that includes: author name(s) and affiliation(s); three-four keywords; and an email address for the lead author. An abstract of up to 200 words should be provided on the first page of the paper. If you are sending an extended abstract\, include a very brief plan for developing the full paper at the end of your text.\n\n\n\nAgree to your paper being discussed in a small group with other participants\, as arranged by the workshop facilitators\, and be willing and able to provide a short (5-minute maximum) overview of your paper to others in the discussion group.\n\n\n\nCommit to attending the whole workshop if your submission is accepted.\n\n\n\n\nPlease note that if we receive more submissions than we can accommodate\, there will be selection of papers on the basis of their fit with AMLE and their stage of development. \n\n\n\nYou can still attend and participate in Part 2 if you do not have work to discuss in Part 1. Note\, however\, that preference will be given to authors that submit papers for Part 1. Email Todd Bridgman by 30 September 2025\, if you wish to register without submitting work for Part 1. \n\n\n\nRegistration\n\n\n\nThere is no registration fee\, but participants are responsible for arranging their own travel and accommodation. Registration\, submission of an extended abstract\, and commitment to attend is required for all participants wishing to attend Part 1 and Part 2 of the PDW. Those who wish to attend Part 2 but not submit work for Part 1 are required to indicate their interest in attending.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-paper-development-workshop-wellington-new-zealand/
CATEGORIES:Event Calendar,Journal Workshops,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/amle_pdw.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251101T000000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260104T000000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T041307Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T041307Z
UID:10000026-1761955200-1767484800@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Call for Special Issue Papers: Management Learning and Education as Drivers of Fundamental Alternative Forms of Organizing
DESCRIPTION:Guest Editors\n\n\n\n\nSimon Pek\, University of Victoria (Canada)\n\n\n\nFrédéric Dufays\, HEC Liège-ULiège & KU Leuven (Belgium)\n\n\n\nMartyna Śliwa\, University of Durham (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nAjnesh Prasad\, Tecnológico de Monterrey (Mexico)\n\n\n\nAmon Barros\, FGV EAESP (Brazil)\n\n\n\n\nAMLE Editors\n\n\n\n\nLaura Colombo\, University of Exeter (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nKatrin Muehlfeld\, Trier University (Germany)\n\n\n\n\nCall for Papers\n\n\n\nIn promoting managerialism and shareholder value maximization\, business schools have long been implicated in perpetuating what has come to be popularized as grand challenges in the literature. These include\, among other phenomena\, climate change\, biodiversity loss\, economic and gender inequality (e.g.\, Kumar et al.\, 2024; Locke & Spender\, 2011; Parker\, 2018). AMLE\, in particular\, has been at the vanguard of identifying and interrogating the nexus between business schools\, management education\, and management learning\, on the one hand\, and the perpetuation of grand challenges\, on the other hand. For example\, in describing the economic arrangements that structure society\, Fotaki and Prasad (2015: 558) observed almost a decade ago: “[M]any blind spots and unanswered questions about the complicity of business schools in propagating inequalities under neoliberal regimes still exist.” More recently\, turning to the matter of climate change\, Colombo and colleagues (2024) lamented in an editorial about the historical role of management learning and education (MLE) in contributing to the deteriorating state of the world’s natural environment. This led them to ask: “How can our discipline help envision and shape a thriving future\, in a way that contributes knowledge\, skills\, and wisdom toward tackling the contemporary ecological and climate crises?” (207). Observations such as these are being raised with greater frequency and urgency by MLE scholars seeking to tackle pernicious societal grand challenges (Figueiró\, Neutzling\, & Lessa\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nTo tackle grand challenges\, attention has been given to alternative organizations and the positive societal impact they generate (e.g.\, Cavotta & Mena\, 2023)\, as well as to their prefigurative function of and for an alternative future—a future that is better aligned with social and environmental considerations (Bhatt\, Qureshi\, Shukla\, & Hota\, 2024; Schiller-Merkens\, 2024). Researchers commonly use the term alternative organizations to describe those that meaningfully depart from some of the defining characteristics of traditional corporations. Such alternative forms include\, among others\, cooperatives\, stakeholder firms\, social enterprises\, and employee-owned firms (e.g.\, Chen & Chen\, 2021; Kociatkiewicz\, Kostera\, & Parker\, 2021; Luyckx\, Schneider\, & Kourula\, 2022; Mair & Rathert\, 2021; Pek\, 2023).  \n\n\n\nWhen alternative forms of organizing have been studied in the discipline of management\, they have been largely reduced to incremental alternatives\, pointing to “anything different to the traditional for-profit model” (Barin Cruz\, Aquino Alves\, & Delbridge\, 2017: 324). Social enterprises are perhaps the quintessential incremental alternative. They have received a tremendous amount of scholarly attention to date in both management (Battilana & Lee\, 2014) and MLE research (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012; Tracey & Phillips\, 2007).  \n\n\n\nIn this special issue\, we are specifically interested in fundamental (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017) alternative forms of organizing\, which “challenge some of the classic principles of the capitalist system” (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017: 323). Specifically\, we consider fundamental alternative organizations as embracing joint or collective ownership instead of private ownership (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Luyckx et al.\, 2022). This includes a broad diversity of organizations\, including cooperatives (Zamagni & Zamagni\, 2010)\, communes (Frye\, 2022)\, broad-based employee ownership in the form of employee ownership trusts (Michael\, 2017) and employee stock ownership plans (Blasi\, Scharf\, & Kruse\, 2023)\, Indigenous economic development corporations (Savic & Hoicka\, 2023)\, bicameral firms (Ferreras\, 2017)\, commons-based peer production (Benkler & Nissenbaum\, 2006)\, and community self-organizations\, such as collective Black enterprises in the Colombian Pacific (Tubb\, 2018). These organizations often\, but not always\, complement this distinctive approach to ownership with more democratic governance and management (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Pek\, 2021).  \n\n\n\nFundamental alternatives have received only marginal attention from MLE scholars (though there are some exceptions\, e.g.\, Audebrand\, Camus\, & Michaud\, 2017) and they continue to remain largely absent from mainstream management textbooks (Rankin & Piwko\, 2022). This curious lack of MLE engagement with fundamental alternative forms of organizing means that students graduating from business schools hoping to tackle grand challenges are not equipped with the tools and concepts necessary to be able to do so. For MLE scholarship to achieve its ostensible aim of producing socially conscientious leaders for a sustainable future\, business school curricula must be broadened so as to include these fundamental alternative organizations.  \n\n\n\nTo be sure\, this is no small feat. Those who have tried to incorporate such organizations into their curricula have identified a range of challenges. For example\, Audebrand and colleagues (2017) observed resistance from students (e.g.\, limited interest) as well as instructors (e.g.\, limited resources). Fournier (2006: 297) found that\, while students actively engaged with concepts pertaining to alternative organizing\, “they all demonstrated a lack of faith in their very possibility.” Yet\, there is some evidence of how MLE can subvert even the most culturally embedded of social systems. Zulfiqar and Prasad (2021)\, for example\, have illuminated how engaged pedagogy intended to raise consciousness on social inequalities among privileged business school students can unsettle and transcend taken-for-granted assumptions about the world.  \n\n\n\nWith an eye on tackling societal grand challenges\, MLE scholarship can and should play a major role in distilling the challenges to teaching and learning pertaining to fundamental alternative organizing and identifying solutions that can overcome them. These span the three domains of MLE research – i.e.\, the business of business schools\, management learning\, and management education (Lindebaum\, 2024) – and their intersectional phenomena\, including business schools’ and universities’ governance arrangements (Billsberry\, Ambrosini\, & Thomas\, 2023; Wright\, Greenwood\, & Boden\, 2011)\, inter-departmental relationships (Parker\, 2021)\, student consumerism (Naidoo\, Shankar\, & Veer\, 2011)\, and pedagogical interventions (Parker\, Racz\, & Palmer\, 2018; Reedy & Learmonth\, 2009). This special issue aims to generate new theory about fundamental alternative organizations and MLE and\, in so doing\, respond to calls for more critical thinking about the objectives of management education\, greater collaboration with other scholarly disciplines\, and a broadening of our pedagogical approaches (Colombo et al.\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nIllustrative Themes and Research Questions\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and the Business of Business Schools \n\n\n\n\nHow can challenges to incorporating fundamental alternatives be overcome by instructors\, business school leaders\, and accreditation agencies? For example\, would different approaches to business school governance—perhaps those modeled on fundamental alternatives themselves like Mondragon University (Wright et al.\, 2011)—be helpful in this regard?\n\n\n\nHow can fundamental alternatives be woven into professional and executive education programs targeted at professionals in both traditional businesses and fundamental alternatives? What are the opportunities to rethink existing business models in this regard\, such as developing targeted programs to support Cooperative Principle #5 on Education\, Training\, and Information from the statement of cooperative identity? (International Co-operative Alliance\, n.d.)\n\n\n\nHow does integrating fundamental alternatives into MLE affect business schools’ relationships with stakeholders such as corporate philanthropic partners?\n\n\n\nHow do fundamental alternatives configure in MLE in unique and contrasting ways across cultures? For instance\, do the form and/or effects of fundamental alternatives materialize differently in Global South versus Global North business school contexts?\n\n\n\nHow\, and to what effects\, could dominant publishers like Harvard Business Publishing better incorporate fundamental alternatives into their products? (Bridgman et al.\, 2016)\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Learning \n\n\n\n\nWhat new skills and competencies can students acquire through different pedagogical strategies focused on fundamental alternatives? For example\, do these pedagogical strategies contribute to the development of civic capacities? (Colombo\, 2023) Paradoxically\, what skills and competencies might students inadvertently not acquire when moving MLE beyond its dominant focus on traditional business models to also include fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat potential unintended consequences like the amplification of formal\, social\, and psychological disempowerment (Diefenbach\, 2020) might arise from teaching about fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow are instructors personally and professionally transformed through engaging with fundamental alternatives in their pedagogy? Do they\, for instance\, become more engaged in the governance of their business schools? Do they become more involved in activities that support the creation of fundamental alternatives? (Esper\, Cabantous\, Barin-Cruz\, & Gond\, 2017)\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives inspire student entrepreneurs to develop new business models and practices (Pepin\, Tremblay\, Audebrand\, & Chassé\, 2024)?\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives help students prefigure their paths toward a new economy (Schiller-Merkens\, 2024)? To what extent does it impact their identity (formation) as students\, as citizens\, and/or as entrepreneurs? (Solbreux\, Hermans\, Pondeville\, & Dufays\, 2024)\n\n\n\nDo the internal dynamics of fundamental alternatives offer new perspectives on diversity\, equity\, and inclusion (DEI) and\, if so\, how might they intervene in polemical debates over “woke” DEI policies taking place among business school academics? (Prasad & Śliwa\, 2024\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Education \n\n\n\nFundamental alternative organizations have been largely ignored in contemporary MLE scholarship as evidenced in their omission in economics and management texts (e.g.\, Kalmi\, 2007; Rankin & Piwko\, 2022; Schugurensky & McCollum\, 2010). Instead\, the traditional investor-owned\, capitalist enterprise maintains a hegemonic presence in MLE despite growing concerns for more sustainability in business school education (Figueiró et al.\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024). MLE researchers can help unpack the factors that may have contributed to this state of affairs. \n\n\n\n\nRe-tracing the history of business schools (McLaren et al.\, 2021; Spicer\, Jaser\, & Wiertz\, 2021; Wanderley\, Alcadipani\, & Barros\, 2021)\, what key events may have contributed to the current marginal place of fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of isomorphic pressures generated by key actors like accreditation bodies in silencing or making fundamental alternatives visible in management education? (Romero\, 2008)\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of broader social discourses like student consumerism (Naidoo et al.\, 2011) and managerialism (Clegg\, 2014) in undermining fundamental alternatives in MLE?\n\n\n\nWhy has MLE scholarship readily embraced incremental alternatives like social enterprises\, while not affording similar legitimacy to fundamental alternatives like worker cooperatives and broad-based employee ownership?\n\n\n\n\nWhile some authors have incorporated fundamental alternatives into their teaching (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)\, there is much to learn about how fundamental alternatives could be integrated into different pedagogies. Additionally\, we need a deeper understanding of the challenges instructors might face and how those challenges could be overcome. MLE scholarship has much to contribute to both of these closely related topics. \n\n\n\n\nHow can existing MLE pedagogies like experiential learning and service learning be translated to teach fundamental alternative organizations effectively? For example\, should students’ and instructors’ interactions with organizations in service learning projects (Mazutis\, 2024) differ in the case of fundamental alternatives versus incremental alternatives or traditional businesses?\n\n\n\nHow should educational efforts focused on fundamental alternatives be integrated and sequenced with those on traditional business topics (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012)?\n\n\n\nHow can educational practices currently used to teach fundamental alternative organizations in other disciplines (e.g.\, Manley\, 2021; Meek & Woodworth\, 1990) be leveraged and translated into business schools?\n\n\n\nWhat challenges might instructors and students face when engaging with fundamental alternatives in different contexts (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)? For example\, how might student consumerism\, which varies across countries (Fairchild & Crage\, 2014)\, affect instructors’ implementation of pedagogical strategies targeted towards fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow can educational repositories like the Curriculum Library for Employee Ownership become legitimated as important empirical resources in delivering management education?\n\n\n\n\nSubmission Types\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special issue. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated (for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE). All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nInquiries\n\n\n\nThose interested in contributing to this special issue are welcome to contact Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) with their questions. We encourage authors interested in submitting a book or resource review to contact us prior to preparing a manuscript. Authors interested in submitting a book or resource review should identify the work to be reviewed and a brief explanation of how it fits the remit of the special issue. \n\n\n\nPlease note that consultation with the guest editors is neither a prerequisite nor an expectation for submission to the special issue. \n\n\n\nSpecial Issue Timeline and Process\n\n\n\nSubmissions will be accepted via AMLE’s Manuscript Central portal between November 1\, 2025 and December 15\, 2025. \n\n\n\nPrior to submission\, we will hold an optional virtual professional development workshop on June 25\, 2025\, for interested authors to receive feedback on their ideas. Those interested in participating in the workshop should e-mail a 3\,000-word proposal (including references) to Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) by May 15\, 2025. We also plan to offer workshops to discuss this special issue at the 85th Academy of Management Conference in Copenhagen and the 41st EGOS Colloquium in Athens. We will share more details about these and other opportunities when available via the AMLE website and various listservs. While we encourage interested contributors to participate in these opportunities\, they are not a prerequisite for\, or a guarantee of\, eventual acceptance in the special issue. \n\n\n\nFollowing our first-round decisions\, we will hold a second optional professional development workshop for authors who receive a revise and resubmit decision following the first round of peer review. It is tentatively scheduled for Spring 2025\, and full details will be shared when available. \n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nAudebrand\, L. K.\, Camus\, A.\, & Michaud\, V. 2017. A mosquito in the classroom: Using the cooperative business model to foster paradoxical thinking in management education. Journal of Management Education\, 41(2): 216–248. \n\n\n\nBarin Cruz\, L.\, Aquino Alves\, M.\, & Delbridge\, R. 2017. Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda. Introduction to the Special Issue. M@n@gement\, 20(4): 322–335. \n\n\n\nBattilana\, J.\, & Lee\, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals\, 8(1): 397–441. \n\n\n\nBenkler\, Y.\, & Nissenbaum\, H. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy\, 14(4): 394–419. \n\n\n\nBhatt\, B.\, Qureshi\, I.\, Shukla\, D. M.\, & Hota\, P. K. 2024. Prefiguring alternative organizing: Confronting marginalization through projective cultural adjustment and tempered autonomy. Organization Studies\, 45(1): 59–84. \n\n\n\nBillsberry\, J.\, Ambrosini\, V.\, & Thomas\, L. 2023. Managerialist control in post-pandemic business schools: The tragedy of the new normal and a new hope. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(3)\, 439-458. \n\n\n\nBlasi\, J.\, Scharf\, A.\, & Kruse\, D. 2023. Employee ownership in the US: Some issues on ESOPs – overcoming the barriers to further development. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership\, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-11-2022-0028. \n\n\n\nBridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, & McLaughlin\, C. 2016. Restating the case: How revisiting the development of the case method can help us think differently about the future of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 15(4)\, 724-741. \n\n\n\nCavotta\, V.\, & Mena\, S. 2023. Prosocial organizing and the distance between core and community work. Organization Studies\, 44(4): 637–657. \n\n\n\nChen\, K. K.\, & Chen\, V. T. 2021. “What if” and “if only” futures beyond conventional capitalism and bureaucracy: Imagining collectivist and democratic possibilities for organizing. In K. K. Chen & V. T. Chen (Eds.)\, Research in the sociology of organizations: 1–28. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nClegg\, S. R. 2014. Managerialism: Born in the USA. Academy of Management Review\, 39(4): 566–576. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A. 2023. Civilize the business school: For a civic management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(1): 132–149. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A.\, Moser\, C.\, Muehlfeld\, K.\, & Joy\, S. 2024. Sowing the seeds of change: Calling for a social–ecological approach to management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(2): 207–213. \n\n\n\nDiefenbach\, T. 2020. The democratic organisation: Democracy and the future of work. Routledge. \n\n\n\nEsper\, S. C.\, Cabantous\, L.\, Barin-Cruz\, L.\, & Gond\, J.-P. 2017. Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization\, 24(5): 671–699. \n\n\n\nFairchild\, E.\, & Crage\, S. 2014. Beyond the debates: Measuring and specifying student consumerism. Sociological Spectrum\, 34(5): 403–420. \n\n\n\nFerreras\, I. 2017. Firms as political entities: Saving democracy through economic bicameralism. Cambridge University Press. \n\n\n\nFigueiró\, P. S.\, Neutzling\, D. M.\, & Lessa\, B. 2022. Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production\, 339: 130539. \n\n\n\nFotaki\, M.\, & Prasad\, A. 2015. Questioning neoliberal capitalism and economic inequality in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 14(4): 556–575. \n\n\n\nFournier\, V. 2006. Breaking from the weight of the eternal present: Teaching organizational difference. Management Learning\, 37(3): 295–311. \n\n\n\nFrye\, H. 2022. Commons\, Communes\, and Freedom. Politics\, Philosophy & Economics\, 21(2): 228–244. \n\n\n\nInternational Co-operative Alliance. n.d. Cooperative identity\, values & principles. https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity\, February 4\, 2021. \n\n\n\nKalmi\, P. 2007. The disappearance of cooperatives from economics textbooks. Cambridge Journal of Economics\, 31(4): 625–647. \n\n\n\nKociatkiewicz\, J.\, Kostera\, M.\, & Parker\, M. 2021. The possibility of disalienated work: Being at home in alternative organizations. Human Relations\, 74(7): 933–957. \n\n\n\nKumar\, A.\, Soundararajan\, V.\, Bapuji\, H.\, Köhler\, T.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, Morsing\, M.\, & Coraiola\, D. M. 2024. Unequal Worlds: Management Education and Inequalities. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(3)\, 379-386. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D. 2024. Management Learning and Education as “big picture” social science. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(1): 1–7. \n\n\n\nLocke\, R. R.\, & Spender\, J.-C. 2011. Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance. Bloomsbury Publishing. \n\n\n\nLuyckx\, J.\, Schneider\, A.\, & Kourula\, A. 2022. Learning from alternatives: Analyzing alternative ways of organizing as starting points for improving the corporation. In R. E. Meyer\, S. Leixnering\, & J. Veldman (Eds.)\, Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 209–231. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nMailhot\, C.\, & Lachapelle\, M. D. 2024. Teaching management in the context of Grand Challenges: A pragmatist approach. Management Learning\, 55(2): 167–191. \n\n\n\nMair\, J.\, & Rathert\, N. 2021. Alternative organizing with social purpose: Revisiting institutional analysis of market-based activity. Socio-Economic Review\, 19(2): 817–836. \n\n\n\nManley\, S. W.\, Julian. 2021. Co-operative education: From Mondragón and Bilbao to Preston. The Preston Model and Community Wealth Building. Routledge. \n\n\n\nMazutis\, D. 2024. Making a difference: Taking community stakeholders seriously. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, amle.2022.0342. \n\n\n\nMcLaren\, P. G.\, Bridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, Lubinski\, C.\, O’Connor\, E.\, et al. 2021. From the editors—new times\, new histories of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 293–299. \n\n\n\nMeek\, C. B.\, & Woodworth\, W. P. 1990. Technical training and enterprise: Mondragon’s Educational system and its implications for other cooperatives. Economic and Industrial Democracy\, 11(4): 505–528. \n\n\n\nMichael\, C. 2017. The Employee Ownership Trust\, an ESOP Alternative. Probate and Property\, 31(1): 42–47. \n\n\n\nNaidoo\, R.\, Shankar\, A.\, & Veer\, E. 2011. The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management\, 27(11–12): 1142–1162. \n\n\n\nPache\, A.-C.\, & Chowdhury\, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 11(3): 494–510. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2018. Shut Down the Business School. London: Pluto Press. https://ideas.repec.org//b/ucp/bkecon/9780745399171.html. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2021. The critical business school and the university: A case study of resistance and co-optation. Critical Sociology\, 47(7–8): 1111–1124. \n\n\n\nParker\, S.\, Racz\, M. M.\, & Palmer\, P. W. 2018. Decentering the learner through alternative organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings\, 2018(1): 16086. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2021. Drawing out democracy: The role of sortition in preventing and overcoming organizational degeneration in worker-owned firms. Journal of Management Inquiry\, 30(2): 193–206. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2023. Reconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publics. M@n@gement\, 26(4)\, 68-82. \n\n\n\nPepin\, M.\, Tremblay\, M.\, Audebrand\, L. K.\, & Chassé\, S. 2024. The responsible business model canvas: Designing and assessing a sustainable business modeling tool for students and start-up entrepreneurs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\, 25(3): 514–538. \n\n\n\nPrasad\, A.\, & Śliwa\, M. 2024. Critiquing the backlash against wokeness: In defense of DEI scholarship and practice. Academy of Management Perspectives\, 38(2): 245-259. \n\n\n\nRankin\, R.\, & Piwko\, P. M. 2022. An analysis of the coverage of cooperatives in U.S. introductory business textbooks. Journal of Accounting and Finance\, 22(3). https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JAF/article/view/5228. \n\n\n\nReedy\, P.\, & Learmonth\, M. 2009. Other possibilities? The contribution to management education of alternative organizations. Management Learning\, 40(3): 241–258. \n\n\n\nRomero\, E. J. 2008. AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 7(2): 245–255. \n\n\n\nSavic\, K.\, & Hoicka\, C. E. 2023. Indigenous legal forms and governance structures in renewable energy: Assessing the role and perspectives of First Nations economic development corporations. Energy Research & Social Science\, 101\, 103121. \n\n\n\nSchiller-Merkens\, S. 2024. Prefiguring an alternative economy: Understanding prefigurative organizing and its struggles. Organization\, 31(3): 458–476. \n\n\n\nSchugurensky\, D.\, & McCollum\, E. 2010. Notes in the margins: The social economy in economics and business textbooks. Researching the Social Economy: 154–175. University of Toronto Press. \n\n\n\nSolbreux\, J.\, Hermans\, J.\, Pondeville\, S.\, & Dufays\, F. 2024. It all starts with a story: Questioning dominant entrepreneurial identities through collective narrative practices. International Small Business Journal\, 42(1): 90–123. \n\n\n\nSpicer\, A.\, Jaser\, Z.\, & Wiertz\, C. 2021. The future of the business school: Finding hope in alternative pasts. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 459–466. \n\n\n\nTracey\, P.\, & Phillips\, N. 2007. The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 6(2): 264–271. \n\n\n\nTubb\, D. G. L. 2018. The everyday social economy of Afro-descendants in the Chocó\, Colombia. In C. S. Hossein (Ed.)\, The Black social economy in the Americas: Exploring diverse community-based markets: 97–117. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. \n\n\n\nWanderley\, S.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, & Barros\, A. 2021. Recentering the Global South in the making of business school histories: Dependency ambiguity in action. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 361–381. \n\n\n\nWright\, S.\, Greenwood\, D.\, & Boden\, R. 2011. Report on a field visit to Mondragón University: A cooperative experience/experiment. Learning and Teaching\, 4(3): 38–56. \n\n\n\nZamagni\, S.\, & Zamagni\, V. 2010. Cooperative enterprise: Facing the challenge of globalization. Edward Elgar Publishing. \n\n\n\nZulfiqar\, G.\, & Prasad\, A. 2021. Challenging social inequality in the Global South: Class\, privilege\, and consciousness-raising through critical management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(2): 156-181.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-call-for-special-issue-papers-management-learning-and-education-as-drivers-of-fundamental-alternative-forms-of-organizing/
CATEGORIES:Call for Special Issue Papers,Call for Submissions,Event Calendar,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/amle_cfs.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251101T000000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251215T000000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T040809Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T040809Z
UID:10000014-1761955200-1765756800@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:Management Learning and Education as Drivers of Fundamental Alternative Forms of Organizing
DESCRIPTION:Guest Editors\n\n\n\n\nSimon Pek\, University of Victoria (Canada)\n\n\n\nFrédéric Dufays\, HEC Liège-ULiège & KU Leuven (Belgium)\n\n\n\nMartyna Śliwa\, University of Durham (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nAjnesh Prasad\, Tecnológico de Monterrey (Mexico)\n\n\n\nAmon Barros\, FGV EAASP (Brazil)\n\n\n\n\nAMLE Editors\n\n\n\n\nLaura Colombo\, University of Exeter (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nKatrin Muehlfeld\, Trier University (Germany)\n\n\n\n\nCall for Papers\n\n\n\nIn promoting managerialism and shareholder value maximization\, business schools have long been implicated in perpetuating what has come to be popularized as grand challenges in the literature. These include\, among other phenomena\, climate change\, biodiversity loss\, economic and gender inequality (e.g.\, Kumar et al.\, 2024; Locke & Spender\, 2011; Parker\, 2018). AMLE\, in particular\, has been at the vanguard of identifying and interrogating the nexus between business schools\, management education\, and management learning\, on the one hand\, and the perpetuation of grand challenges\, on the other hand. For example\, in describing the economic arrangements that structure society\, Fotaki and Prasad (2015: 558) observed almost a decade ago: “[M]any blind spots and unanswered questions about the complicity of business schools in propagating inequalities under neoliberal regimes still exist.” More recently\, turning to the matter of climate change\, Colombo and colleagues (2024) lamented in an editorial about the historical role of management learning and education (MLE) in contributing to the deteriorating state of the world’s natural environment. This led them to ask: “How can our discipline help envision and shape a thriving future\, in a way that contributes knowledge\, skills\, and wisdom toward tackling the contemporary ecological and climate crises?” (207). Observations such as these are being raised with greater frequency and urgency by MLE scholars seeking to tackle pernicious societal grand challenges (Figueiró\, Neutzling\, & Lessa\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nTo tackle grand challenges\, attention has been given to alternative organizations and the positive societal impact they generate (e.g.\, Cavotta & Mena\, 2023)\, as well as to their prefigurative function of and for an alternative future—a future that is better aligned with social and environmental considerations (Bhatt\, Qureshi\, Shukla\, & Hota\, 2024; Schiller-Merkens\, 2024). Researchers commonly use the term alternative organizations to describe those that meaningfully depart from some of the defining characteristics of traditional corporations. Such alternative forms include\, among others\, cooperatives\, stakeholder firms\, social enterprises\, and employee-owned firms (e.g.\, Chen & Chen\, 2021; Kociatkiewicz\, Kostera\, & Parker\, 2021; Luyckx\, Schneider\, & Kourula\, 2022; Mair & Rathert\, 2021; Pek\, 2023).  \n\n\n\nWhen alternative forms of organizing have been studied in the discipline of management\, they have been largely reduced to incremental alternatives\, pointing to “anything different to the traditional for-profit model” (Barin Cruz\, Aquino Alves\, & Delbridge\, 2017: 324). Social enterprises are perhaps the quintessential incremental alternative. They have received a tremendous amount of scholarly attention to date in both management (Battilana & Lee\, 2014) and MLE research (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012; Tracey & Phillips\, 2007).  \n\n\n\nIn this special issue\, we are specifically interested in fundamental (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017) alternative forms of organizing\, which “challenge some of the classic principles of the capitalist system” (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017: 323). Specifically\, we consider fundamental alternative organizations as embracing joint or collective ownership instead of private ownership (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Luyckx et al.\, 2022). This includes a broad diversity of organizations\, including cooperatives (Zamagni & Zamagni\, 2010)\, communes (Frye\, 2022)\, broad-based employee ownership in the form of employee ownership trusts (Michael\, 2017) and employee stock ownership plans (Blasi\, Scharf\, & Kruse\, 2023)\, Indigenous economic development corporations (Savic & Hoicka\, 2023)\, bicameral firms (Ferreras\, 2017)\, commons-based peer production (Benkler & Nissenbaum\, 2006)\, and community self-organizations\, such as collective Black enterprises in the Colombian Pacific (Tubb\, 2018). These organizations often\, but not always\, complement this distinctive approach to ownership with more democratic governance and management (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Pek\, 2021).  \n\n\n\nFundamental alternatives have received only marginal attention from MLE scholars (though there are some exceptions\, e.g.\, Audebrand\, Camus\, & Michaud\, 2017) and they continue to remain largely absent from mainstream management textbooks (Rankin & Piwko\, 2022). This curious lack of MLE engagement with fundamental alternative forms of organizing means that students graduating from business schools hoping to tackle grand challenges are not equipped with the tools and concepts necessary to be able to do so. For MLE scholarship to achieve its ostensible aim of producing socially conscientious leaders for a sustainable future\, business school curricula must be broadened so as to include these fundamental alternative organizations.  \n\n\n\nTo be sure\, this is no small feat. Those who have tried to incorporate such organizations into their curricula have identified a range of challenges. For example\, Audebrand and colleagues (2017) observed resistance from students (e.g.\, limited interest) as well as instructors (e.g.\, limited resources). Fournier (2006: 297) found that\, while students actively engaged with concepts pertaining to alternative organizing\, “they all demonstrated a lack of faith in their very possibility.” Yet\, there is some evidence of how MLE can subvert even the most culturally embedded of social systems. Zulfiqar and Prasad (2021)\, for example\, have illuminated how engaged pedagogy intended to raise consciousness on social inequalities among privileged business school students can unsettle and transcend taken-for-granted assumptions about the world.  \n\n\n\nWith an eye on tackling societal grand challenges\, MLE scholarship can and should play a major role in distilling the challenges to teaching and learning pertaining to fundamental alternative organizing and identifying solutions that can overcome them. These span the three domains of MLE research – i.e.\, the business of business schools\, management learning\, and management education (Lindebaum\, 2024) – and their intersectional phenomena\, including business schools’ and universities’ governance arrangements (Billsberry\, Ambrosini\, & Thomas\, 2023; Wright\, Greenwood\, & Boden\, 2011)\, inter-departmental relationships (Parker\, 2021)\, student consumerism (Naidoo\, Shankar\, & Veer\, 2011)\, and pedagogical interventions (Parker\, Racz\, & Palmer\, 2018; Reedy & Learmonth\, 2009). This special issue aims to generate new theory about fundamental alternative organizations and MLE and\, in so doing\, respond to calls for more critical thinking about the objectives of management education\, greater collaboration with other scholarly disciplines\, and a broadening of our pedagogical approaches (Colombo et al.\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nIllustrative Themes and Research Questions\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and the Business of Business Schools \n\n\n\n\nHow can challenges to incorporating fundamental alternatives be overcome by instructors\, business school leaders\, and accreditation agencies? For example\, would different approaches to business school governance—perhaps those modeled on fundamental alternatives themselves like Mondragon University (Wright et al.\, 2011)—be helpful in this regard?\n\n\n\nHow can fundamental alternatives be woven into professional and executive education programs targeted at professionals in both traditional businesses and fundamental alternatives? What are the opportunities to rethink existing business models in this regard\, such as developing targeted programs to support Cooperative Principle #5 on Education\, Training\, and Information from the statement of cooperative identity? (International Co-operative Alliance\, n.d.)\n\n\n\nHow does integrating fundamental alternatives into MLE affect business schools’ relationships with stakeholders such as corporate philanthropic partners?\n\n\n\nHow do fundamental alternatives configure in MLE in unique and contrasting ways across cultures? For instance\, do the form and/or effects of fundamental alternatives materialize differently in Global South versus Global North business school contexts?\n\n\n\nHow\, and to what effects\, could dominant publishers like Harvard Business Publishing better incorporate fundamental alternatives into their products? (Bridgman et al.\, 2016)\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Learning \n\n\n\n\nWhat new skills and competencies can students acquire through different pedagogical strategies focused on fundamental alternatives? For example\, do these pedagogical strategies contribute to the development of civic capacities? (Colombo\, 2023) Paradoxically\, what skills and competencies might students inadvertently not acquire when moving MLE beyond its dominant focus on traditional business models to also include fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat potential unintended consequences like the amplification of formal\, social\, and psychological disempowerment (Diefenbach\, 2020) might arise from teaching about fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow are instructors personally and professionally transformed through engaging with fundamental alternatives in their pedagogy? Do they\, for instance\, become more engaged in the governance of their business schools? Do they become more involved in activities that support the creation of fundamental alternatives? (Esper\, Cabantous\, Barin-Cruz\, & Gond\, 2017)\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives inspire student entrepreneurs to develop new business models and practices (Pepin\, Tremblay\, Audebrand\, & Chassé\, 2024)?\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives help students prefigure their paths toward a new economy (Schiller-Merkens\, 2024)? To what extent does it impact their identity (formation) as students\, as citizens\, and/or as entrepreneurs? (Solbreux\, Hermans\, Pondeville\, & Dufays\, 2024)\n\n\n\nDo the internal dynamics of fundamental alternatives offer new perspectives on diversity\, equity\, and inclusion (DEI) and\, if so\, how might they intervene in polemical debates over “woke” DEI policies taking place among business school academics? (Prasad & Śliwa\, 2024\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Education \n\n\n\nFundamental alternative organizations have been largely ignored in contemporary MLE scholarship as evidenced in their omission in economics and management texts (e.g.\, Kalmi\, 2007; Rankin & Piwko\, 2022; Schugurensky & McCollum\, 2010). Instead\, the traditional investor-owned\, capitalist enterprise maintains a hegemonic presence in MLE despite growing concerns for more sustainability in business school education (Figueiró et al.\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024). MLE researchers can help unpack the factors that may have contributed to this state of affairs. \n\n\n\n\nRe-tracing the history of business schools (McLaren et al.\, 2021; Spicer\, Jaser\, & Wiertz\, 2021; Wanderley\, Alcadipani\, & Barros\, 2021)\, what key events may have contributed to the current marginal place of fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of isomorphic pressures generated by key actors like accreditation bodies in silencing or making fundamental alternatives visible in management education? (Romero\, 2008)\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of broader social discourses like student consumerism (Naidoo et al.\, 2011) and managerialism (Clegg\, 2014) in undermining fundamental alternatives in MLE?\n\n\n\nWhy has MLE scholarship readily embraced incremental alternatives like social enterprises\, while not affording similar legitimacy to fundamental alternatives like worker cooperatives and broad-based employee ownership?\n\n\n\n\nWhile some authors have incorporated fundamental alternatives into their teaching (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)\, there is much to learn about how fundamental alternatives could be integrated into different pedagogies. Additionally\, we need a deeper understanding of the challenges instructors might face and how those challenges could be overcome. MLE scholarship has much to contribute to both of these closely related topics. \n\n\n\n\nHow can existing MLE pedagogies like experiential learning and service learning be translated to teach fundamental alternative organizations effectively? For example\, should students’ and instructors’ interactions with organizations in service learning projects (Mazutis\, 2024) differ in the case of fundamental alternatives versus incremental alternatives or traditional businesses?\n\n\n\nHow should educational efforts focused on fundamental alternatives be integrated and sequenced with those on traditional business topics (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012)?\n\n\n\nHow can educational practices currently used to teach fundamental alternative organizations in other disciplines (e.g.\, Manley\, 2021; Meek & Woodworth\, 1990) be leveraged and translated into business schools?\n\n\n\nWhat challenges might instructors and students face when engaging with fundamental alternatives in different contexts (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)? For example\, how might student consumerism\, which varies across countries (Fairchild & Crage\, 2014)\, affect instructors’ implementation of pedagogical strategies targeted towards fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow can educational repositories like the Curriculum Library for Employee Ownership become legitimated as important empirical resources in delivering management education?\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop Structure\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special issue. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated (for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE). All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nSubmission Types\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special issue. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated (for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE). All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nInquiries\n\n\n\nThose interested in contributing to this special issue are welcome to contact Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) with their questions. We encourage authors interested in submitting a book or resource review to contact us prior to preparing a manuscript. Authors interested in submitting a book or resource review should identify the work to be reviewed and a brief explanation of how it fits the remit of the special issue. \n\n\n\nPlease note that consultation with the guest editors is neither a prerequisite nor an expectation for submission to the special issue. \n\n\n\nSpecial Issue Timeline and Process\n\n\n\nSubmissions will be accepted via AMLE’s Manuscript Central portal between November 1\, 2025 and December 15\, 2025. \n\n\n\nPrior to submission\, we will hold an optional virtual professional development workshop on June 25\, 2025\, for interested authors to receive feedback on their ideas. Those interested in participating in the workshop should e-mail a 3\,000-word proposal (including references) to Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) by May 15\, 2025. We also plan to offer workshops to discuss this special issue at the 85th Academy of Management Conference in Copenhagen and the 41st EGOS Colloquium in Athens. We will share more details about these and other opportunities when available via the AMLE website and various listservs. While we encourage interested contributors to participate in these opportunities\, they are not a prerequisite for\, or a guarantee of\, eventual acceptance in the special issue. \n\n\n\nFollowing our first-round decisions\, we will hold a second optional professional development workshop for authors who receive a revise and resubmit decision following the first round of peer review. It is tentatively scheduled for Spring 2025\, and full details will be shared when available. \n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nAudebrand\, L. K.\, Camus\, A.\, & Michaud\, V. 2017. A mosquito in the classroom: Using the cooperative business model to foster paradoxical thinking in management education. Journal of Management Education\, 41(2): 216–248. \n\n\n\nBarin Cruz\, L.\, Aquino Alves\, M.\, & Delbridge\, R. 2017. Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda. Introduction to the Special Issue. M@n@gement\, 20(4): 322–335. \n\n\n\nBattilana\, J.\, & Lee\, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals\, 8(1): 397–441. \n\n\n\nBenkler\, Y.\, & Nissenbaum\, H. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy\, 14(4): 394–419. \n\n\n\nBhatt\, B.\, Qureshi\, I.\, Shukla\, D. M.\, & Hota\, P. K. 2024. Prefiguring alternative organizing: Confronting marginalization through projective cultural adjustment and tempered autonomy. Organization Studies\, 45(1): 59–84. \n\n\n\nBillsberry\, J.\, Ambrosini\, V.\, & Thomas\, L. 2023. Managerialist control in post-pandemic business schools: The tragedy of the new normal and a new hope. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(3)\, 439-458. \n\n\n\nBlasi\, J.\, Scharf\, A.\, & Kruse\, D. 2023. Employee ownership in the US: Some issues on ESOPs – overcoming the barriers to further development. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership\, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-11-2022-0028. \n\n\n\nBridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, & McLaughlin\, C. 2016. Restating the case: How revisiting the development of the case method can help us think differently about the future of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 15(4)\, 724-741. \n\n\n\nCavotta\, V.\, & Mena\, S. 2023. Prosocial organizing and the distance between core and community work. Organization Studies\, 44(4): 637–657. \n\n\n\nChen\, K. K.\, & Chen\, V. T. 2021. “What if” and “if only” futures beyond conventional capitalism and bureaucracy: Imagining collectivist and democratic possibilities for organizing. In K. K. Chen & V. T. Chen (Eds.)\, Research in the sociology of organizations: 1–28. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nClegg\, S. R. 2014. Managerialism: Born in the USA. Academy of Management Review\, 39(4): 566–576. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A. 2023. Civilize the business school: For a civic management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(1): 132–149. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A.\, Moser\, C.\, Muehlfeld\, K.\, & Joy\, S. 2024. Sowing the seeds of change: Calling for a social–ecological approach to management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(2): 207–213. \n\n\n\nDiefenbach\, T. 2020. The democratic organisation: Democracy and the future of work. Routledge. \n\n\n\nEsper\, S. C.\, Cabantous\, L.\, Barin-Cruz\, L.\, & Gond\, J.-P. 2017. Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization\, 24(5): 671–699. \n\n\n\nFairchild\, E.\, & Crage\, S. 2014. Beyond the debates: Measuring and specifying student consumerism. Sociological Spectrum\, 34(5): 403–420. \n\n\n\nFerreras\, I. 2017. Firms as political entities: Saving democracy through economic bicameralism. Cambridge University Press. \n\n\n\nFigueiró\, P. S.\, Neutzling\, D. M.\, & Lessa\, B. 2022. Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production\, 339: 130539. \n\n\n\nFotaki\, M.\, & Prasad\, A. 2015. Questioning neoliberal capitalism and economic inequality in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 14(4): 556–575. \n\n\n\nFournier\, V. 2006. Breaking from the weight of the eternal present: Teaching organizational difference. Management Learning\, 37(3): 295–311. \n\n\n\nFrye\, H. 2022. Commons\, Communes\, and Freedom. Politics\, Philosophy & Economics\, 21(2): 228–244. \n\n\n\nInternational Co-operative Alliance. n.d. Cooperative identity\, values & principles. https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity\, February 4\, 2021. \n\n\n\nKalmi\, P. 2007. The disappearance of cooperatives from economics textbooks. Cambridge Journal of Economics\, 31(4): 625–647. \n\n\n\nKociatkiewicz\, J.\, Kostera\, M.\, & Parker\, M. 2021. The possibility of disalienated work: Being at home in alternative organizations. Human Relations\, 74(7): 933–957. \n\n\n\nKumar\, A.\, Soundararajan\, V.\, Bapuji\, H.\, Köhler\, T.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, Morsing\, M.\, & Coraiola\, D. M. 2024. Unequal Worlds: Management Education and Inequalities. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(3)\, 379-386. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D. 2024. Management Learning and Education as “big picture” social science. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(1): 1–7. \n\n\n\nLocke\, R. R.\, & Spender\, J.-C. 2011. Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance. Bloomsbury Publishing. \n\n\n\nLuyckx\, J.\, Schneider\, A.\, & Kourula\, A. 2022. Learning from alternatives: Analyzing alternative ways of organizing as starting points for improving the corporation. In R. E. Meyer\, S. Leixnering\, & J. Veldman (Eds.)\, Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 209–231. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nMailhot\, C.\, & Lachapelle\, M. D. 2024. Teaching management in the context of Grand Challenges: A pragmatist approach. Management Learning\, 55(2): 167–191. \n\n\n\nMair\, J.\, & Rathert\, N. 2021. Alternative organizing with social purpose: Revisiting institutional analysis of market-based activity. Socio-Economic Review\, 19(2): 817–836. \n\n\n\nManley\, S. W.\, Julian. 2021. Co-operative education: From Mondragón and Bilbao to Preston. The Preston Model and Community Wealth Building. Routledge. \n\n\n\nMazutis\, D. 2024. Making a difference: Taking community stakeholders seriously. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, amle.2022.0342. \n\n\n\nMcLaren\, P. G.\, Bridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, Lubinski\, C.\, O’Connor\, E.\, et al. 2021. From the editors—new times\, new histories of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 293–299. \n\n\n\nMeek\, C. B.\, & Woodworth\, W. P. 1990. Technical training and enterprise: Mondragon’s Educational system and its implications for other cooperatives. Economic and Industrial Democracy\, 11(4): 505–528. \n\n\n\nMichael\, C. 2017. The Employee Ownership Trust\, an ESOP Alternative. Probate and Property\, 31(1): 42–47. \n\n\n\nNaidoo\, R.\, Shankar\, A.\, & Veer\, E. 2011. The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management\, 27(11–12): 1142–1162. \n\n\n\nPache\, A.-C.\, & Chowdhury\, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 11(3): 494–510. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2018. Shut Down the Business School. London: Pluto Press. https://ideas.repec.org//b/ucp/bkecon/9780745399171.html. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2021. The critical business school and the university: A case study of resistance and co-optation. Critical Sociology\, 47(7–8): 1111–1124. \n\n\n\nParker\, S.\, Racz\, M. M.\, & Palmer\, P. W. 2018. Decentering the learner through alternative organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings\, 2018(1): 16086. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2021. Drawing out democracy: The role of sortition in preventing and overcoming organizational degeneration in worker-owned firms. Journal of Management Inquiry\, 30(2): 193–206. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2023. Reconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publics. M@n@gement\, 26(4)\, 68-82. \n\n\n\nPepin\, M.\, Tremblay\, M.\, Audebrand\, L. K.\, & Chassé\, S. 2024. The responsible business model canvas: Designing and assessing a sustainable business modeling tool for students and start-up entrepreneurs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\, 25(3): 514–538. \n\n\n\nPrasad\, A.\, & Śliwa\, M. 2024. Critiquing the backlash against wokeness: In defense of DEI scholarship and practice. Academy of Management Perspectives\, 38(2): 245-259. \n\n\n\nRankin\, R.\, & Piwko\, P. M. 2022. An analysis of the coverage of cooperatives in U.S. introductory business textbooks. Journal of Accounting and Finance\, 22(3). https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JAF/article/view/5228. \n\n\n\nReedy\, P.\, & Learmonth\, M. 2009. Other possibilities? The contribution to management education of alternative organizations. Management Learning\, 40(3): 241–258. \n\n\n\nRomero\, E. J. 2008. AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 7(2): 245–255. \n\n\n\nSavic\, K.\, & Hoicka\, C. E. 2023. Indigenous legal forms and governance structures in renewable energy: Assessing the role and perspectives of First Nations economic development corporations. Energy Research & Social Science\, 101\, 103121. \n\n\n\nSchiller-Merkens\, S. 2024. Prefiguring an alternative economy: Understanding prefigurative organizing and its struggles. Organization\, 31(3): 458–476. \n\n\n\nSchugurensky\, D.\, & McCollum\, E. 2010. Notes in the margins: The social economy in economics and business textbooks. Researching the Social Economy: 154–175. University of Toronto Press. \n\n\n\nSolbreux\, J.\, Hermans\, J.\, Pondeville\, S.\, & Dufays\, F. 2024. It all starts with a story: Questioning dominant entrepreneurial identities through collective narrative practices. International Small Business Journal\, 42(1): 90–123. \n\n\n\nSpicer\, A.\, Jaser\, Z.\, & Wiertz\, C. 2021. The future of the business school: Finding hope in alternative pasts. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 459–466. \n\n\n\nTracey\, P.\, & Phillips\, N. 2007. The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 6(2): 264–271. \n\n\n\nTubb\, D. G. L. 2018. The everyday social economy of Afro-descendants in the Chocó\, Colombia. In C. S. Hossein (Ed.)\, The Black social economy in the Americas: Exploring diverse community-based markets: 97–117. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. \n\n\n\nWanderley\, S.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, & Barros\, A. 2021. Recentering the Global South in the making of business school histories: Dependency ambiguity in action. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 361–381. \n\n\n\nWright\, S.\, Greenwood\, D.\, & Boden\, R. 2011. Report on a field visit to Mondragón University: A cooperative experience/experiment. Learning and Teaching\, 4(3): 38–56. \n\n\n\nZamagni\, S.\, & Zamagni\, V. 2010. Cooperative enterprise: Facing the challenge of globalization. Edward Elgar Publishing. \n\n\n\nZulfiqar\, G.\, & Prasad\, A. 2021. Challenging social inequality in the Global South: Class\, privilege\, and consciousness-raising through critical management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(2): 156-181.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/management-learning-and-education-as-drivers-of-fundamental-alternative-forms-of-organizing-2/
CATEGORIES:Call for Special Issue Papers,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/amle_cfs.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251101T000000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251215T000000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260225T035320Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260225T035320Z
UID:10000010-1761955200-1765756800@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:Management Learning and Education as Drivers of Fundamental Alternative Forms of Organizing
DESCRIPTION:Guest Editors\n\n\n\n\nSimon Pek\, University of Victoria (Canada)\n\n\n\nFrédéric Dufays\, HEC Liège-ULiège & KU Leuven (Belgium)\n\n\n\nMartyna Śliwa\, University of Durham (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nAjnesh Prasad\, Tecnológico de Monterrey (Mexico)\n\n\n\nAmon Barros\, FGV EAASP (Brazil)\n\n\n\n\nAMLE Editors\n\n\n\n\nLaura Colombo\, University of Exeter (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nKatrin Muehlfeld\, Trier University (Germany)\n\n\n\n\nCall for Papers\n\n\n\nIn promoting managerialism and shareholder value maximization\, business schools have long been implicated in perpetuating what has come to be popularized as grand challenges in the literature. These include\, among other phenomena\, climate change\, biodiversity loss\, economic and gender inequality (e.g.\, Kumar et al.\, 2024; Locke & Spender\, 2011; Parker\, 2018). AMLE\, in particular\, has been at the vanguard of identifying and interrogating the nexus between business schools\, management education\, and management learning\, on the one hand\, and the perpetuation of grand challenges\, on the other hand. For example\, in describing the economic arrangements that structure society\, Fotaki and Prasad (2015: 558) observed almost a decade ago: “[M]any blind spots and unanswered questions about the complicity of business schools in propagating inequalities under neoliberal regimes still exist.” More recently\, turning to the matter of climate change\, Colombo and colleagues (2024) lamented in an editorial about the historical role of management learning and education (MLE) in contributing to the deteriorating state of the world’s natural environment. This led them to ask: “How can our discipline help envision and shape a thriving future\, in a way that contributes knowledge\, skills\, and wisdom toward tackling the contemporary ecological and climate crises?” (207). Observations such as these are being raised with greater frequency and urgency by MLE scholars seeking to tackle pernicious societal grand challenges (Figueiró\, Neutzling\, & Lessa\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nTo tackle grand challenges\, attention has been given to alternative organizations and the positive societal impact they generate (e.g.\, Cavotta & Mena\, 2023)\, as well as to their prefigurative function of and for an alternative future—a future that is better aligned with social and environmental considerations (Bhatt\, Qureshi\, Shukla\, & Hota\, 2024; Schiller-Merkens\, 2024). Researchers commonly use the term alternative organizations to describe those that meaningfully depart from some of the defining characteristics of traditional corporations. Such alternative forms include\, among others\, cooperatives\, stakeholder firms\, social enterprises\, and employee-owned firms (e.g.\, Chen & Chen\, 2021; Kociatkiewicz\, Kostera\, & Parker\, 2021; Luyckx\, Schneider\, & Kourula\, 2022; Mair & Rathert\, 2021; Pek\, 2023).  \n\n\n\nWhen alternative forms of organizing have been studied in the discipline of management\, they have been largely reduced to incremental alternatives\, pointing to “anything different to the traditional for-profit model” (Barin Cruz\, Aquino Alves\, & Delbridge\, 2017: 324). Social enterprises are perhaps the quintessential incremental alternative. They have received a tremendous amount of scholarly attention to date in both management (Battilana & Lee\, 2014) and MLE research (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012; Tracey & Phillips\, 2007).  \n\n\n\nIn this special issue\, we are specifically interested in fundamental (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017) alternative forms of organizing\, which “challenge some of the classic principles of the capitalist system” (Barin Cruz et al.\, 2017: 323). Specifically\, we consider fundamental alternative organizations as embracing joint or collective ownership instead of private ownership (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Luyckx et al.\, 2022). This includes a broad diversity of organizations\, including cooperatives (Zamagni & Zamagni\, 2010)\, communes (Frye\, 2022)\, broad-based employee ownership in the form of employee ownership trusts (Michael\, 2017) and employee stock ownership plans (Blasi\, Scharf\, & Kruse\, 2023)\, Indigenous economic development corporations (Savic & Hoicka\, 2023)\, bicameral firms (Ferreras\, 2017)\, commons-based peer production (Benkler & Nissenbaum\, 2006)\, and community self-organizations\, such as collective Black enterprises in the Colombian Pacific (Tubb\, 2018). These organizations often\, but not always\, complement this distinctive approach to ownership with more democratic governance and management (Chen & Chen\, 2021; Pek\, 2021).  \n\n\n\nFundamental alternatives have received only marginal attention from MLE scholars (though there are some exceptions\, e.g.\, Audebrand\, Camus\, & Michaud\, 2017) and they continue to remain largely absent from mainstream management textbooks (Rankin & Piwko\, 2022). This curious lack of MLE engagement with fundamental alternative forms of organizing means that students graduating from business schools hoping to tackle grand challenges are not equipped with the tools and concepts necessary to be able to do so. For MLE scholarship to achieve its ostensible aim of producing socially conscientious leaders for a sustainable future\, business school curricula must be broadened so as to include these fundamental alternative organizations.  \n\n\n\nTo be sure\, this is no small feat. Those who have tried to incorporate such organizations into their curricula have identified a range of challenges. For example\, Audebrand and colleagues (2017) observed resistance from students (e.g.\, limited interest) as well as instructors (e.g.\, limited resources). Fournier (2006: 297) found that\, while students actively engaged with concepts pertaining to alternative organizing\, “they all demonstrated a lack of faith in their very possibility.” Yet\, there is some evidence of how MLE can subvert even the most culturally embedded of social systems. Zulfiqar and Prasad (2021)\, for example\, have illuminated how engaged pedagogy intended to raise consciousness on social inequalities among privileged business school students can unsettle and transcend taken-for-granted assumptions about the world.  \n\n\n\nWith an eye on tackling societal grand challenges\, MLE scholarship can and should play a major role in distilling the challenges to teaching and learning pertaining to fundamental alternative organizing and identifying solutions that can overcome them. These span the three domains of MLE research – i.e.\, the business of business schools\, management learning\, and management education (Lindebaum\, 2024) – and their intersectional phenomena\, including business schools’ and universities’ governance arrangements (Billsberry\, Ambrosini\, & Thomas\, 2023; Wright\, Greenwood\, & Boden\, 2011)\, inter-departmental relationships (Parker\, 2021)\, student consumerism (Naidoo\, Shankar\, & Veer\, 2011)\, and pedagogical interventions (Parker\, Racz\, & Palmer\, 2018; Reedy & Learmonth\, 2009). This special issue aims to generate new theory about fundamental alternative organizations and MLE and\, in so doing\, respond to calls for more critical thinking about the objectives of management education\, greater collaboration with other scholarly disciplines\, and a broadening of our pedagogical approaches (Colombo et al.\, 2024).  \n\n\n\nIllustrative Themes and Research Questions\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and the Business of Business Schools \n\n\n\n\nHow can challenges to incorporating fundamental alternatives be overcome by instructors\, business school leaders\, and accreditation agencies? For example\, would different approaches to business school governance—perhaps those modeled on fundamental alternatives themselves like Mondragon University (Wright et al.\, 2011)—be helpful in this regard?\n\n\n\nHow can fundamental alternatives be woven into professional and executive education programs targeted at professionals in both traditional businesses and fundamental alternatives? What are the opportunities to rethink existing business models in this regard\, such as developing targeted programs to support Cooperative Principle #5 on Education\, Training\, and Information from the statement of cooperative identity? (International Co-operative Alliance\, n.d.)\n\n\n\nHow does integrating fundamental alternatives into MLE affect business schools’ relationships with stakeholders such as corporate philanthropic partners?\n\n\n\nHow do fundamental alternatives configure in MLE in unique and contrasting ways across cultures? For instance\, do the form and/or effects of fundamental alternatives materialize differently in Global South versus Global North business school contexts?\n\n\n\nHow\, and to what effects\, could dominant publishers like Harvard Business Publishing better incorporate fundamental alternatives into their products? (Bridgman et al.\, 2016)\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Learning \n\n\n\n\nWhat new skills and competencies can students acquire through different pedagogical strategies focused on fundamental alternatives? For example\, do these pedagogical strategies contribute to the development of civic capacities? (Colombo\, 2023) Paradoxically\, what skills and competencies might students inadvertently not acquire when moving MLE beyond its dominant focus on traditional business models to also include fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat potential unintended consequences like the amplification of formal\, social\, and psychological disempowerment (Diefenbach\, 2020) might arise from teaching about fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow are instructors personally and professionally transformed through engaging with fundamental alternatives in their pedagogy? Do they\, for instance\, become more engaged in the governance of their business schools? Do they become more involved in activities that support the creation of fundamental alternatives? (Esper\, Cabantous\, Barin-Cruz\, & Gond\, 2017)\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives inspire student entrepreneurs to develop new business models and practices (Pepin\, Tremblay\, Audebrand\, & Chassé\, 2024)?\n\n\n\nHow can teaching fundamental alternatives help students prefigure their paths toward a new economy (Schiller-Merkens\, 2024)? To what extent does it impact their identity (formation) as students\, as citizens\, and/or as entrepreneurs? (Solbreux\, Hermans\, Pondeville\, & Dufays\, 2024)\n\n\n\nDo the internal dynamics of fundamental alternatives offer new perspectives on diversity\, equity\, and inclusion (DEI) and\, if so\, how might they intervene in polemical debates over “woke” DEI policies taking place among business school academics? (Prasad & Śliwa\, 2024\n\n\n\n\nFundamental Alternative Organizations and Management Education \n\n\n\nFundamental alternative organizations have been largely ignored in contemporary MLE scholarship as evidenced in their omission in economics and management texts (e.g.\, Kalmi\, 2007; Rankin & Piwko\, 2022; Schugurensky & McCollum\, 2010). Instead\, the traditional investor-owned\, capitalist enterprise maintains a hegemonic presence in MLE despite growing concerns for more sustainability in business school education (Figueiró et al.\, 2022; Mailhot & Lachapelle\, 2024). MLE researchers can help unpack the factors that may have contributed to this state of affairs. \n\n\n\n\nRe-tracing the history of business schools (McLaren et al.\, 2021; Spicer\, Jaser\, & Wiertz\, 2021; Wanderley\, Alcadipani\, & Barros\, 2021)\, what key events may have contributed to the current marginal place of fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of isomorphic pressures generated by key actors like accreditation bodies in silencing or making fundamental alternatives visible in management education? (Romero\, 2008)\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of broader social discourses like student consumerism (Naidoo et al.\, 2011) and managerialism (Clegg\, 2014) in undermining fundamental alternatives in MLE?\n\n\n\nWhy has MLE scholarship readily embraced incremental alternatives like social enterprises\, while not affording similar legitimacy to fundamental alternatives like worker cooperatives and broad-based employee ownership?\n\n\n\n\nWhile some authors have incorporated fundamental alternatives into their teaching (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)\, there is much to learn about how fundamental alternatives could be integrated into different pedagogies. Additionally\, we need a deeper understanding of the challenges instructors might face and how those challenges could be overcome. MLE scholarship has much to contribute to both of these closely related topics. \n\n\n\n\nHow can existing MLE pedagogies like experiential learning and service learning be translated to teach fundamental alternative organizations effectively? For example\, should students’ and instructors’ interactions with organizations in service learning projects (Mazutis\, 2024) differ in the case of fundamental alternatives versus incremental alternatives or traditional businesses?\n\n\n\nHow should educational efforts focused on fundamental alternatives be integrated and sequenced with those on traditional business topics (Pache & Chowdhury\, 2012)?\n\n\n\nHow can educational practices currently used to teach fundamental alternative organizations in other disciplines (e.g.\, Manley\, 2021; Meek & Woodworth\, 1990) be leveraged and translated into business schools?\n\n\n\nWhat challenges might instructors and students face when engaging with fundamental alternatives in different contexts (Audebrand et al.\, 2017; Fournier\, 2006)? For example\, how might student consumerism\, which varies across countries (Fairchild & Crage\, 2014)\, affect instructors’ implementation of pedagogical strategies targeted towards fundamental alternatives?\n\n\n\nHow can educational repositories like the Curriculum Library for Employee Ownership become legitimated as important empirical resources in delivering management education?\n\n\n\n\nWorkshop Structure\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special issue. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated (for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE). All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nSubmission Types\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special issue. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated (for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE). All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nInquiries\n\n\n\nThose interested in contributing to this special issue are welcome to contact Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) with their questions. We encourage authors interested in submitting a book or resource review to contact us prior to preparing a manuscript. Authors interested in submitting a book or resource review should identify the work to be reviewed and a brief explanation of how it fits the remit of the special issue. \n\n\n\nPlease note that consultation with the guest editors is neither a prerequisite nor an expectation for submission to the special issue. \n\n\n\nSpecial Issue Timeline and Process\n\n\n\nSubmissions will be accepted via AMLE’s Manuscript Central portal between November 1\, 2025 and December 15\, 2025. \n\n\n\nPrior to submission\, we will hold an optional virtual professional development workshop on June 25\, 2025\, for interested authors to receive feedback on their ideas. Those interested in participating in the workshop should e-mail a 3\,000-word proposal (including references) to Simon Pek (spek@uvic.ca) and Ajnesh Prasad (prasad@tec.mx) by May 15\, 2025. We also plan to offer workshops to discuss this special issue at the 85th Academy of Management Conference in Copenhagen and the 41st EGOS Colloquium in Athens. We will share more details about these and other opportunities when available via the AMLE website and various listservs. While we encourage interested contributors to participate in these opportunities\, they are not a prerequisite for\, or a guarantee of\, eventual acceptance in the special issue. \n\n\n\nFollowing our first-round decisions\, we will hold a second optional professional development workshop for authors who receive a revise and resubmit decision following the first round of peer review. It is tentatively scheduled for Spring 2025\, and full details will be shared when available. \n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nAudebrand\, L. K.\, Camus\, A.\, & Michaud\, V. 2017. A mosquito in the classroom: Using the cooperative business model to foster paradoxical thinking in management education. Journal of Management Education\, 41(2): 216–248. \n\n\n\nBarin Cruz\, L.\, Aquino Alves\, M.\, & Delbridge\, R. 2017. Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda. Introduction to the Special Issue. M@n@gement\, 20(4): 322–335. \n\n\n\nBattilana\, J.\, & Lee\, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals\, 8(1): 397–441. \n\n\n\nBenkler\, Y.\, & Nissenbaum\, H. 2006. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy\, 14(4): 394–419. \n\n\n\nBhatt\, B.\, Qureshi\, I.\, Shukla\, D. M.\, & Hota\, P. K. 2024. Prefiguring alternative organizing: Confronting marginalization through projective cultural adjustment and tempered autonomy. Organization Studies\, 45(1): 59–84. \n\n\n\nBillsberry\, J.\, Ambrosini\, V.\, & Thomas\, L. 2023. Managerialist control in post-pandemic business schools: The tragedy of the new normal and a new hope. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(3)\, 439-458. \n\n\n\nBlasi\, J.\, Scharf\, A.\, & Kruse\, D. 2023. Employee ownership in the US: Some issues on ESOPs – overcoming the barriers to further development. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership\, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-11-2022-0028. \n\n\n\nBridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, & McLaughlin\, C. 2016. Restating the case: How revisiting the development of the case method can help us think differently about the future of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 15(4)\, 724-741. \n\n\n\nCavotta\, V.\, & Mena\, S. 2023. Prosocial organizing and the distance between core and community work. Organization Studies\, 44(4): 637–657. \n\n\n\nChen\, K. K.\, & Chen\, V. T. 2021. “What if” and “if only” futures beyond conventional capitalism and bureaucracy: Imagining collectivist and democratic possibilities for organizing. In K. K. Chen & V. T. Chen (Eds.)\, Research in the sociology of organizations: 1–28. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nClegg\, S. R. 2014. Managerialism: Born in the USA. Academy of Management Review\, 39(4): 566–576. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A. 2023. Civilize the business school: For a civic management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22(1): 132–149. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A.\, Moser\, C.\, Muehlfeld\, K.\, & Joy\, S. 2024. Sowing the seeds of change: Calling for a social–ecological approach to management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(2): 207–213. \n\n\n\nDiefenbach\, T. 2020. The democratic organisation: Democracy and the future of work. Routledge. \n\n\n\nEsper\, S. C.\, Cabantous\, L.\, Barin-Cruz\, L.\, & Gond\, J.-P. 2017. Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization\, 24(5): 671–699. \n\n\n\nFairchild\, E.\, & Crage\, S. 2014. Beyond the debates: Measuring and specifying student consumerism. Sociological Spectrum\, 34(5): 403–420. \n\n\n\nFerreras\, I. 2017. Firms as political entities: Saving democracy through economic bicameralism. Cambridge University Press. \n\n\n\nFigueiró\, P. S.\, Neutzling\, D. M.\, & Lessa\, B. 2022. Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production\, 339: 130539. \n\n\n\nFotaki\, M.\, & Prasad\, A. 2015. Questioning neoliberal capitalism and economic inequality in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 14(4): 556–575. \n\n\n\nFournier\, V. 2006. Breaking from the weight of the eternal present: Teaching organizational difference. Management Learning\, 37(3): 295–311. \n\n\n\nFrye\, H. 2022. Commons\, Communes\, and Freedom. Politics\, Philosophy & Economics\, 21(2): 228–244. \n\n\n\nInternational Co-operative Alliance. n.d. Cooperative identity\, values & principles. https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity\, February 4\, 2021. \n\n\n\nKalmi\, P. 2007. The disappearance of cooperatives from economics textbooks. Cambridge Journal of Economics\, 31(4): 625–647. \n\n\n\nKociatkiewicz\, J.\, Kostera\, M.\, & Parker\, M. 2021. The possibility of disalienated work: Being at home in alternative organizations. Human Relations\, 74(7): 933–957. \n\n\n\nKumar\, A.\, Soundararajan\, V.\, Bapuji\, H.\, Köhler\, T.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, Morsing\, M.\, & Coraiola\, D. M. 2024. Unequal Worlds: Management Education and Inequalities. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(3)\, 379-386. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D. 2024. Management Learning and Education as “big picture” social science. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(1): 1–7. \n\n\n\nLocke\, R. R.\, & Spender\, J.-C. 2011. Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance. Bloomsbury Publishing. \n\n\n\nLuyckx\, J.\, Schneider\, A.\, & Kourula\, A. 2022. Learning from alternatives: Analyzing alternative ways of organizing as starting points for improving the corporation. In R. E. Meyer\, S. Leixnering\, & J. Veldman (Eds.)\, Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 209–231. Emerald Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nMailhot\, C.\, & Lachapelle\, M. D. 2024. Teaching management in the context of Grand Challenges: A pragmatist approach. Management Learning\, 55(2): 167–191. \n\n\n\nMair\, J.\, & Rathert\, N. 2021. Alternative organizing with social purpose: Revisiting institutional analysis of market-based activity. Socio-Economic Review\, 19(2): 817–836. \n\n\n\nManley\, S. W.\, Julian. 2021. Co-operative education: From Mondragón and Bilbao to Preston. The Preston Model and Community Wealth Building. Routledge. \n\n\n\nMazutis\, D. 2024. Making a difference: Taking community stakeholders seriously. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, amle.2022.0342. \n\n\n\nMcLaren\, P. G.\, Bridgman\, T.\, Cummings\, S.\, Lubinski\, C.\, O’Connor\, E.\, et al. 2021. From the editors—new times\, new histories of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 293–299. \n\n\n\nMeek\, C. B.\, & Woodworth\, W. P. 1990. Technical training and enterprise: Mondragon’s Educational system and its implications for other cooperatives. Economic and Industrial Democracy\, 11(4): 505–528. \n\n\n\nMichael\, C. 2017. The Employee Ownership Trust\, an ESOP Alternative. Probate and Property\, 31(1): 42–47. \n\n\n\nNaidoo\, R.\, Shankar\, A.\, & Veer\, E. 2011. The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management\, 27(11–12): 1142–1162. \n\n\n\nPache\, A.-C.\, & Chowdhury\, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 11(3): 494–510. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2018. Shut Down the Business School. London: Pluto Press. https://ideas.repec.org//b/ucp/bkecon/9780745399171.html. \n\n\n\nParker\, M. 2021. The critical business school and the university: A case study of resistance and co-optation. Critical Sociology\, 47(7–8): 1111–1124. \n\n\n\nParker\, S.\, Racz\, M. M.\, & Palmer\, P. W. 2018. Decentering the learner through alternative organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings\, 2018(1): 16086. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2021. Drawing out democracy: The role of sortition in preventing and overcoming organizational degeneration in worker-owned firms. Journal of Management Inquiry\, 30(2): 193–206. \n\n\n\nPek\, S. 2023. Reconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publics. M@n@gement\, 26(4)\, 68-82. \n\n\n\nPepin\, M.\, Tremblay\, M.\, Audebrand\, L. K.\, & Chassé\, S. 2024. The responsible business model canvas: Designing and assessing a sustainable business modeling tool for students and start-up entrepreneurs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\, 25(3): 514–538. \n\n\n\nPrasad\, A.\, & Śliwa\, M. 2024. Critiquing the backlash against wokeness: In defense of DEI scholarship and practice. Academy of Management Perspectives\, 38(2): 245-259. \n\n\n\nRankin\, R.\, & Piwko\, P. M. 2022. An analysis of the coverage of cooperatives in U.S. introductory business textbooks. Journal of Accounting and Finance\, 22(3). https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JAF/article/view/5228. \n\n\n\nReedy\, P.\, & Learmonth\, M. 2009. Other possibilities? The contribution to management education of alternative organizations. Management Learning\, 40(3): 241–258. \n\n\n\nRomero\, E. J. 2008. AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 7(2): 245–255. \n\n\n\nSavic\, K.\, & Hoicka\, C. E. 2023. Indigenous legal forms and governance structures in renewable energy: Assessing the role and perspectives of First Nations economic development corporations. Energy Research & Social Science\, 101\, 103121. \n\n\n\nSchiller-Merkens\, S. 2024. Prefiguring an alternative economy: Understanding prefigurative organizing and its struggles. Organization\, 31(3): 458–476. \n\n\n\nSchugurensky\, D.\, & McCollum\, E. 2010. Notes in the margins: The social economy in economics and business textbooks. Researching the Social Economy: 154–175. University of Toronto Press. \n\n\n\nSolbreux\, J.\, Hermans\, J.\, Pondeville\, S.\, & Dufays\, F. 2024. It all starts with a story: Questioning dominant entrepreneurial identities through collective narrative practices. International Small Business Journal\, 42(1): 90–123. \n\n\n\nSpicer\, A.\, Jaser\, Z.\, & Wiertz\, C. 2021. The future of the business school: Finding hope in alternative pasts. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 459–466. \n\n\n\nTracey\, P.\, & Phillips\, N. 2007. The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 6(2): 264–271. \n\n\n\nTubb\, D. G. L. 2018. The everyday social economy of Afro-descendants in the Chocó\, Colombia. In C. S. Hossein (Ed.)\, The Black social economy in the Americas: Exploring diverse community-based markets: 97–117. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. \n\n\n\nWanderley\, S.\, Alcadipani\, R.\, & Barros\, A. 2021. Recentering the Global South in the making of business school histories: Dependency ambiguity in action. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(3): 361–381. \n\n\n\nWright\, S.\, Greenwood\, D.\, & Boden\, R. 2011. Report on a field visit to Mondragón University: A cooperative experience/experiment. Learning and Teaching\, 4(3): 38–56. \n\n\n\nZamagni\, S.\, & Zamagni\, V. 2010. Cooperative enterprise: Facing the challenge of globalization. Edward Elgar Publishing. \n\n\n\nZulfiqar\, G.\, & Prasad\, A. 2021. Challenging social inequality in the Global South: Class\, privilege\, and consciousness-raising through critical management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 20(2): 156-181.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/management-learning-and-education-as-drivers-of-fundamental-alternative-forms-of-organizing/
CATEGORIES:Call for Special Issue Papers,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/amle_cfs.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vilnius:20251029T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vilnius:20251029T160000
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T041306Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T041306Z
UID:10000024-1761732000-1761753600@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Paper Development Workshop\, Vilnius\, Lithuania
DESCRIPTION:Register and Submit Here\n\n\n\n\nLed By\n\n\n\n\nOlga Ryazanova\, Associate Editor AMLE\, Maynooth University\n\n\n\nChristine Moser: Associate Editor AMLE\, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\n\n\n\n\nLocal Organizer\n\n\n\n\nVita Akstinaite\, Vice-President for Research & Faculty\, ISM University\n\n\n\n\nAbout AMLE\n\n\n\nAcademy of Management Learning & Education (AMLE) is rated as 4* in the UK CABS list and A* in the Australian Business Deans’ Council list of journals. AMLE publishes theory-driven studies on management learning\, management education\, or the business of business schools. For empirical papers\, this means that where the research sample is composed of learners\, they are higher education students in business school(s) or school(s) of management\, or they are managers learning in executive contexts. Where the sample is composed of faculty\, then they are situated within a business school(s) or school(s) of management. \n\n\n\nRegistration\n\n\n\nThere is no registration fee\, but participants are responsible for arranging their own travel and accommodation. Registration\, submission of short paper\, and commitment to attend are required for all participants wishing to attend both parts of the PDW. The places in Part 2 are limited and are allocated to the first 15 submissions which meet the requirements below. \n\n\n\nSubmission deadline: 12 September 2025 \n\n\n\nCatering\n\n\n\nRefreshments and lunch will be provided. ISM University of Management and Economics generously sponsored catering and lunch for a limited number of participants.  \n\n\n\nWorkshop Structure\n\n\n\nThis workshop has two main parts. \n\n\n\nPart 1 comprises a general introduction to AMLE. The main focus is on writing manuscripts that advance our theoretical understanding of MLE phenomena for the research article and essay sections of the journal. This first part of the workshop is open to all interested participants. \n\n\n\nPart 2 is focused on supporting and advising researchers\, with current work-in-progress\, on how to develop and refine their papers with submission to AMLE in mind. Those wishing to participate in Part 2 should note the requirements listed above. \n\n\n\nApproximate schedule for the day: \n\n\n\n10:00-11:00 – Presentation of the journal and Q&A \n\n\n\n11:00-11:45 – Theoretical contribution in the AMLE \n\n\n\n11:45-12:00 – Coffee break \n\n\n\n12:00-13:30 – Roundtable discussion of submitted papers \n\n\n\n13:30-14:30 – Lunch \n\n\n\n14:30-16:00 – Continuation of roundtable discussion and Q&A \n\n\n\nSubmission\n\n\n\nClearly mark the subject line as: PDW Submission at ISM University. Your submission must have a cover page that includes: the author name(s) and affiliation(s); three to four keywords; and an email address for the lead author. An abstract of up to 200 words should be provided on the first page of the paper. Please note that by registering you: \n\n\n\n\nAgree to your paper being discussed in a small group with other participants\, as arranged by the workshop facilitators\, and be willing and able to provide a short (5-minute maximum) overview of your paper to others in the discussion group.\n\n\n\nCommit to attending the whole workshop if your submission is accepted.\n\n\n\n\nYou can still attend and participate if you do not have work to discuss in Part 2. As with paper submissions\, please let us know by 12 September 2025 if you wish to register without submitting work for Part 2. \n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nCaza\, A.\, Harley\, B.\, Coraiola\, D.M.\, Lindebaum\, D.\, & Moser\, C.\, 2024. What is a contribution and how can you make one at AMLE? Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23: 523-528. \n\n\n\nHibbert\, P.\, Caza\, A.\, Coraiola\, D.M.\, Gerhardt\, M.\, Greenberg\, D.\, Laasch\, O.\, Lindebaum\, D.\, Rigg\, C.\, Ryazanova\, O.\, & Wright\, A.L.\, 2023. Why be an editor? Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 22: 569-573. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D.\, 2024. Management learning and education as “big picture” social science. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23: 1-7. \n\n\n\nRockmann\, K.\, Bunderson\, J.S.\, Leana\, C.R.\, Hibbert\, P.\, Tihanyi\, L.\, Phan\, P.H.\, & Thatcher\, S.M.\, 2021. Publishing in the Academy of Management journals. Academy of Management Perspectives\, 35: 165-174. \n\n\n\nVince\, R.\, & Hibbert\, P.\, 2018. From the AMLE editorial team: Disciplined provocation: Writing essays for AMLE. Academy of Management\, Learning and Education\, 17: 397-400.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-paper-development-workshop-vilnius-lithuania/
CATEGORIES:Event Calendar,Journal Workshops,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/amle_pdw.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260411T194015
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260411T194015
DTSTAMP:20260411T194015
CREATED:20260226T045346Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260226T045346Z
UID:10000033-0-0@www.aom.org
SUMMARY:AMLE Special Section Call for Papers: Learning to Hope In and Through Management Learning & Education
DESCRIPTION:Submission Deadline: 27 February 2026 \n\n\n\nAnticipated Publication: December 2026 \n\n\n\n\n\nSubmission Guidelines\n\n\n\n\n\nRegister Here\n\n\n\n\n\nAMLE Editors\n\n\n\n\nKatrin Muehlfeld\, Trier University (Germany)\n\n\n\nLaura Colombo\, University of Exeter (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\nStuart Middleton\, University of Queensland (Australia)\n\n\n\nTodd Bridgman\, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zealand)\n\n\n\nDirk Lindebaum\, University of Bath (United Kingdom)\n\n\n\n\nCall for Papers\n\n\n\nHope is situated between what is and what might be. As such\, hope is typically experienced under conditions of uncertainty\, and there is no paucity of uncertainty in these times of geo-political upheaval and existential threats posed by climate change. Why and how should/can we hope in these troubling times? This is the guiding question for us in this special section. Hope is defined as “the perceived capability to derive pathways to desired goals\, and motivate oneself via agency thinking to use those pathways” (Snyder\, 2002\, p. 249). This definition is useful in four ways: it (i) identifies individual agency as the nucleus of hope; (ii) highlights the intimate connections between agency and pathway thinking (i.e.\, understanding causal relations to overcome obstacles); (iii) emphasizes the action-orientation that hope may imply; and (iv) it highlights the key role of an individual’s cognitive appraisal of the world—past\, present\, and future. As such\, hope has bearings on the pragmatic\, critical\, and spiritual pedagogical foundations of our field and the knowledge that has emerged from it (bell hooks\, 2003; Dewey\, 1922; Freire\, 1992; Harvey\, 1988). \n\n\n\nWhile hope’s crucial relevance to education has been recently highlighted by international research initiatives such as No Limits to Hope\, launched in 2025 by the Club of Rome\, the World Environmental Education Congress and the Fifth Element (WEEC\, 2025)\, hope remains considerably under-explored in (i) management learning\, (ii) management education\, and (iii) the business of business schools. It is only recently that scholars have begun to discuss hope’s potentially pivotal role for and within management (see Hudson\, Wright\, Toubiana\, Jarvis\, Granqvist\, 2025) and\, more specifically\, management learning and education (Lindebaum\, 2025; Skilling et al.\, 2023). This special section in AMLE seeks to harness this nascent momentum to explore why and how hope (as noun) and/or hoping (as verb) can enrich our substantive understanding for tackling grand challenges and bringing about holistic and desirable futures (Comi\, Mosca\, & Whyte\, 2025; Gümüsay & Reinecke\, 2024; Muzio & Wickert\, 2025; Lindebaum\, 2025; Wenzel\, Cabantous\, & Koch\, 2025; Wickert\, 2025; Wright\, 2025). All three thematic priorities in AMLE can and should have a role to play (Lindebaum\, 2025). As to management learning\, learning to hope is essential to who we are as human beings (as agency and pathway thinkers). Concerning management education\, we can leverage appropriate pedagogical approaches to make learning to hope possible. Finally\, institutional structures within business schools (and wider universities) may require careful examination and adjustment if our students are to hope for solutions to grand challenges and holistic and desirable futures. \n\n\n\nIn this special section\, we are specifically interested in exploring the ways in which we may hope in and through management learning and education. Underlining the theory-driven ethos of AMLE (Caza\, Harley\, Coraiola\, Lindebaum\, & Moser\, 2024)\, the special section seeks new theorizing about the role of hope for and within MLE across levels of analysis and in relation to desirable future end states. Building on this\, we are interested in practical insights that may inform management educators and decision-makers in business schools in their initiatives geared at supporting learning to hope in and through management learning and education\, with the ultimate aim of facilitating effective tackling of grand challenges and bringing about desirable futures (e.g.\, Starkey & Tempest\, 2025). Therefore\, submissions could\, for example\, address thematic questions around the following illustrative (but not exclusive) areas of concern: \n\n\n\n1. Hope as multifaceted\, multilevel phenomenon across time \n\n\n\nThe literature on hope features a variety of issues that touch upon the multifaceted nature of hope as a multilevel phenomenon\, ranging from the microlevel of the individual\, to the most aggregate macro-level of society as a whole\, with a whole range of intermediate levels including dyads\, teams\, groups\, and organizations. \n\n\n\nAt the individual level\, questions arise\, such as\, for example: \n\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of ‘talking about hope’ (Lindebaum\, Geddes\, & Jordan\, 2018) in shaping cognitive (re)appraisals around hope? Are there different types of hope that may give rise to different types of behavior—for example\, hope that implies relying on one’s own agency in contrast to hope that encourages waiting for some external force to bring about ‘a miracle’ (e.g.\, Bernardo\, 2010)? If so\, what does it take to transform ‘passive’ hope into hope that embraces one’s own agency?\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of (other) emotions (such as\, for example\, anger or fear) for stimulating of hindering hope?\n\n\n\nAre there any possible negative or dysfunctional consequences for individuals when they learn to hope? If so\, how can they be counteracted?\n\n\n\n\nAt the level of collectives (e.g.\, dyads\, teams\, groups\, organizations\, societies)\, issues that could be addressed include\, for example: \n\n\n\n\nHow can collective hope be conceptualized? By what mechanisms(s) does hope cross from the individual (i.e.\, micro) to the collective (i.e.\, macro) level?\n\n\n\nWhat is the role of emotions in fostering or hindering movement across levels (Ashkanasy\, 2003)\, potentially facilitating the emergence of ‘escalators of hoping’ (Lindebaum\, 2025)?\n\n\n\nHow is hope distinctly conceptualized across cultural contexts (e.g.\, Averill & Sundararajan\, 2005) and what are the consequences and the potential for cross-fertilization to the benefit of MLE? For example\, do Indigenous ways of being and acting offer distinct insights into how to learn to hope when faced with powerful exogenous influences?\n\n\n\n\nSuch macro-level perspectives further point to the need to look back in order to look forward and to explore the embeddedness of conceptualizations of hope within specific historical contexts. Thus\, in terms of a historical perspective\, \n\n\n\n\nHow can historical approaches inform our conceptualization of hope? What can we learn from the past\, as well as from histories of the past\, to provide insight on learning to hope?\n\n\n\nTo what extent and in what ways could reflections at the nexus between historical and cultural perspectives on hope deepen and broaden our understanding of learning to hope?\n\n\n\n\n2. Management Learning\, Education and the business of business schools \n\n\n\nConcerning Management Learning\, possible questions that emerge are: \n\n\n\n\nHow do extant learning theories conceive of learning to hope? Many seminal established theories such as experiential learning (e.g.\, Kolb & Kolb\, 2005) comprise a strong retrospective element. Could they be meaningfully extended to emphasize prospective elements of learning (Lindebaum\, 2024)? Could\, for example\, recent conceptualizations of learners’ transitions through liminal space\, triggered by encounters with threshold concepts (Irving\, Wright\, & Hibbert\, 2019) hold valuable insights for how to broaden the scope of existing learning theories with the aim of fostering understanding of antecedents and boundary conditions of learning to hope?\n\n\n\nHow do cognitive assessments and anticipated emotions interact in individuals’ evaluation of future possible outcomes (Baumeister\, Maranges\, & Sjåstad\, 2018; Baumeister\, Vohs\, Nathan DeWall\, & Zhang\, 2007)? To what extent and under what conditions do anticipated emotions have the potential to steer individuals towards striving for desirable futures? How can these interactions be harnessed in the management classroom to foster learning to hope in and through MLE?\n\n\n\nWhat motivates students to engage in training and education\, especially when ‘all hope seems lost’; that is\, when the state of the world around them makes their futures seem highly uncertain and their present riddled with eco-anxiety?\n\n\n\nWhat motivates students to invest (sometimes significant amounts of time and financial means) in their education when it seems highly uncertain whether they will be able to reap the benefits of this investment (whatever they consider these benefits to be)?\n\n\n\n\nFor management education\, prospective authors may wonder\, for example: \n\n\n\n\nWhy and how do we teach about hope in uncertain times? What can we learn from the past in terms of teaching during times of global upheaval (e.g.\, Lewis\, 2013)? Which pedagogical strategies and interventions may enable students to develop pathway and agency thinking towards holistic and desirable futures?\n\n\n\nDo initiatives to support learning to hope in and for MLE need to distinguish between programs aimed at freshman students\, who have not yet been socialized within a business (school) environment (e.g.\, Ong\, Cunningham\, & Parmar\, 2024) and programs aimed at professionals?\n\n\n\nAre there any potential unintended and adverse consequences that might arise from fostering learning to hope in and for MLE\, for example\, by unintentionally encouraging disengagement from the present\, through focusing on the future?\n\n\n\nIf hope is distinctly conceptualized across cultural contexts (e.g.\, Averill & Sundararajan\, 2005)\, how could this variety of conceptualizations be used to achieve cross-fertilization to the benefit of management education? For example\, how could insights from Indigenous ways of hoping be translated into pedagogies and business school contexts across the globe?\n\n\n\nHow can we buttress and protect the function of hope as management educators\, given that ‘function’ (Keltner & Haidt\, 1999) concerns the regular consequences of a phenomenon in a (socio-ecological) system (Colombo\, Moser\, Muehlfeld\, & Joy\, 2024)?\n\n\n\nHow might spiritual understandings of hope across different cultural and religious contexts\, with their relation to personal character (Comer & Schwarz\, 2020) and human connectedness through love (Berry\, 2010) help in our efforts to pedagogically engage with framing understandings of hope in our classrooms?\n\n\n\nWhat might philosophies of American pragmatism\, as found in Peirce (1878) and Dewey (1922)\, and with its underlying dynamics in nineteenth-century pioneering spirit have to offer for theories of hope in management education? What might the incremental nature of knowledge in this philosophy have to add to our understanding of processes by which hope may emerge and progress?\n\n\n\nWith the roots of critical theory in ancient Gnosticism (Carlin\, 2021)\, is it possible for critical pedagogy to be hopeful? How has hope been represented by leading critical scholars in the education field (e.g.\, Freire\, 1992; bell hooks\, 2003)\, and how might critical theory branch out to other philosophies for advancing a hopeful research agenda?\n\n\n\n\nIn the context of business of business schools\, the following questions could be entertained: \n\n\n\n\nHow do business schools develop institutional structures that hinder and/or facilitate teachers’ and students’ embracing of pathway and agency thinking towards holistic and desirable futures?\n\n\n\nFor scholars who have long critiqued the neoliberal business school\, how might changing macro trends presage elements of hope? Might emergent postliberal philosophies (e.g.\, Middleton\, 2024) affect an emphasis on learning to hope in and through management learning and education? For example\, if\, following the extant business of business schools literature\, American hegemony over higher education may constrain global efforts to tackle grand challenges\, then what does a postliberal shift towards “America First” mean for this hegemony? Might it mean the end of American domination of international business schools? If so\, what could perhaps replace it? \n\n\n\n\nSubmission Types\n\n\n\nWe welcome Research and Review\, Essay\, and Book and Resource Review submissions for this special section. The agnostic ethos of AMLE in terms of underlying paradigms\, theories\, and methods is reiterated—for as long as a submission falls within the remit of AMLE. All of the journal’s standard formatting and peer review guidelines will apply. \n\n\n\nInquiries\n\n\n\nThose interested in contributing to this special issue are welcome to contact any of the editors involved in the special section with their questions: \n\n\n\n\nKatrin Muehlfeld\n\n\n\nLaura Colombo\n\n\n\nStuart Middleton\n\n\n\nTodd Bridgman\n\n\n\nDirk Lindebaum\n\n\n\n\nWe encourage authors interested in submitting a book or resource review to contact Laura Colombo prior to preparing a manuscript. Authors interested in submitting a book or resource review should identify the work to be reviewed and a brief explanation of how it fits the remit of the special section. Please note that consultation with the editors is neither a prerequisite nor an expectation for submission to the special issue. \n\n\n\nSpecial Section Timeline and Process\n\n\n\nSubmissions will be accepted via AMLE’s Manuscript Central portal between the 1st of February\, 2026\, and the 27th of February\, 2026. Prior to submission\, we will hold a virtual paper development workshop (PDW)\, tentatively scheduled for the 1st of Dec 2025\, for interested authors to receive feedback on their ideas. Those interested in participating in the virtual workshop should submit either (a) a full draft paper or (b) a 4\,000–5\,000 word proposal (including an indication of the structure of the proposed paper\, its aims\, key arguments\, theoretical contribution to and practical implications for AMLE) by the 10th of November 2025. While we encourage interested contributors to participate in this PDW\, participation is not a prerequisite for\, or a guarantee of\, eventual acceptance for the special section. Please note that authors whose papers receive an invitation to revise their work for possible inclusion in the special section need to be able to be responsive to strict turnaround times for their revision given that the special section is scheduled for the last issue handled by the current editorial team at AMLE. \n\n\n\nReferences\n\n\n\nAshkanasy\, N. M. (2003). Emotions in organizations: A multi-level perspective. In Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy (pp. 9–54). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. \n\n\n\nAverill\, J.R.\, & Sundararajan\, L. (2005). Hope as rhetoric: Cultural narratives of wishing and coping. In J.A. Eliott (Ed.)\, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Hope (pp. 127–159). New York: Nova Science. \n\n\n\nBaumeister\, R. F.\, Maranges\, H. M.\, & Sjåstad\, H. (2018). Consciousness of the future as a matrix of maybe: Pragmatic prospection and the simulation of alternative possibilities. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory\, Research\, and Practice\, 5(3)\, 223–238. \n\n\n\nBaumeister\, R. F.\, Vohs\, K. D.\, Nathan DeWall\, C.\, & Zhang\, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback\, anticipation\, and reflection\, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review\, 11(2)\, 167–203. \n\n\n\nbell hooks (2003). Teaching community. A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge. \n\n\n\nBernardo\, A. B. (2010). Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope. Personality and Individual Differences\, 49(8)\, 944–949. \n\n\n\nBerry\, W. (2010). A poem of difficult hope. In W. Berry (Ed.)\, A Continuous Harmony. Counterpoint\, 83–61. \n\n\n\nCarlin\, M. (2021). Gnosticism\, progressivism and the (im)possibility of the ethical academy. Educational\, Philosophy and Theory\, 53(5)\, 436– 447. \n\n\n\nCaza\, A.\, Harley\, B.\, Coraiola\, D. M.\, Lindebaum\, D.\, & Moser\, C. (2024). What is a contribution and how can you make one at AMLE?. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(4)\, 523-528. \n\n\n\nColombo\, L. A.\, Moser\, C.\, Muehlfeld\, K.\, & Joy\, S. (2024). Sowing the seeds of change: Calling for a social–ecological approach to management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(2)\, 207–213. \n\n\n\nComer\, D. R.\, & Schwartz\, M. (2020). Adapting Mussar to develop management students’ character. Journal of Management Education\, 44(2)\, 196–246. \n\n\n\nComi\, A.\, Mosca\, L.\, & Whyte\, J. (2025). Future making as emancipatory inquiry: A value‐based exploration of desirable futures. Journal of Management Studies. \n\n\n\nDewey\, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Henry Holt and Company. \n\n\n\nFreire\, P. (1992). Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving the Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company. \n\n\n\nGümüsay\, A. A.\, & Reinecke\, J. (2024). Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organization Theory\, 5(1)\, 26317877241235939. \n\n\n\nHarvey\, J. B. (1988). The Abilene Paradox and Other Meditations on Management. Lexington Books. \n\n\n\nHudson\, B. A.\, Wright\, A.\, Toubiana\, M.\, Jarvis\, L.\, & Granqvist\, N. (2025). The architecture of hope in distressing times and places: Construction\, action\, and possibilities. Organization Studies\, Special Issue Call for Papers\, available from https://journals.sagepub.com/page/oss/call-for-papers. \n\n\n\nIrving\, G.\, Wright\, A.\, & Hibbert\, P. (2019). Threshold concept learning: Emotions and liminal space transitions. Management Learning\, 50(3)\, 355–373. \n\n\n\nKeltner\, D.\, & Haidt\, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion\, 13(5)\, 505–521. \n\n\n\nKolb\, A. Y.\, & Kolb\, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 4(2)\, 193–212. \n\n\n\nLewis\, C. S. (2013). Learning in War Time. In C.S. Lewis (Ed.)\, The Weight of Glory\, William Collins\, 25–46. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D. 2024. Management Learning and Education as “big picture” social science. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(1)\, 1–7. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D. (2025). Hope. Academy of Management Learning & Education. doi:10.5465/amle.2025.0145. \n\n\n\nLindebaum\, D.\, Geddes\, D.\, & Jordan\, P. J. (Eds.). (2018). Social Functions of Emotion and Talking about Emotion at Work. Edward Elgar Publishing. \n\n\n\nMiddleton\, S. (2024). Advancing the Future of Management Education Research. Edward Elgar Publishing. \n\n\n\nMuzio\, D.\, & Wickert\, C. (2025). Climate change and the politics of system‐level change: The challenges of moving beyond incremental transformation. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.13234. \n\n\n\nOng\, M.\, Cunningham\, J. L.\, & Parmar\, B. L. (2024). Lay beliefs about homo economicus: How and why does economics education make us see honesty as effortful?. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 23(1)\, 41–60. \n\n\n\nPeirce\, C. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly\, 12 (January)\, 286–302. \n\n\n\nSkilling\, P.\, Hurd\, F.\, Lips-Wiersma\, M.\, & McGhee\, P. (2023). Navigating hope and despair in sustainability education: A reflexive roadmap for being with eco-anxiety in the classroom. Management Learning\, 54(5)\, 655–679. \n\n\n\nSnyder\, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry\, 13\, 249–275. \n\n\n\nStarkey\, K.\, & Tempest\, S. (2025). The business school and the end of history: Reimagining management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education\, 24(1)\, 111–125. \n\n\n\nWEEC (2025). No Limits to Hope. Transforming learning for better futures. Retrieved from: https://res.cloudinary.com/dnive3aoc/images/v1742891560/NLTH_Call-and-Concept-Note-1/NLTH_Call-and-Concept-Note-1.pdf?_i=AA \n\n\n\nWenzel\, M.\, Cabantous\, L.\, & Koch\, J. (2025). Future making: Towards a practice perspective. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.13222. \n\n\n\nWickert\, C. (2025). What is the future of future making in management research?. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.13230. \n\n\n\nWright\, A. (2025). Back to the future? A caution. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.13226.
URL:https://www.aom.org/calendar/amle-special-section-call-for-papers-learning-to-hope-in-and-through-management-learning-education/
CATEGORIES:Call for Submissions,Event Calendar,Journals,Learning & Education
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/amle_cfs.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR