Skip to main content

Academy of Management Today

By Damla Köroğlu Ünver

At first, freelancing, contingent work, independent contracting, moonlighting, gig work, platform work, on-demand labor—whatever you want to call it—sounds like a dream: work whenever you want and decide how many hours you work. So-called platform work—delivering food, driving passengers, or completing digital tasks remotely from one’s own computer—might seem to offer workers best of both worlds: freedom and flexibility without sacrificing job security and predictability.

From ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft, food delivery platforms like DoorDash, and short-term lodging companies like Airbnb and VRBO to freelance marketplaces like Upwork and Fiverr and digital ecosystems such as Amazon, Google Play, and Apple’s App Store, online platforms have become embedded in everyday economic activity. Although they operate across different industries, these platforms share a common logic: connecting workers, businesses, and consumers through digital infrastructures while redefining how economic opportunities are created, work is coordinated, and value is distributed.

Yet, beneath this vision of autonomy is a more complex reality. As algorithms increasingly mediate interactions between workers, businesses, and consumers, they also reshape relationships among labor, technology, and organizational leaders and managers. Algorithms, rather than supervisors, structure employees’ work schedules, while terms of service replace employment agreements or contracts. This is a model that maximizes efficiency but lacks empathy and a human touch, fails to prioritize equity and workers’ wants and needs, and routinely blurs the boundaries of employers’ responsibility to do right by their employees while allowing them to shirk that responsibility.

Undeniably, platform economies have reshaped the world of work. They have created access to income for millions, lowered barriers to entry across a range of industries and professions, and introduced new ways of coordinating labor. However, this model has also fragmented traditional notions of job security, belonging, management, and decision-making. In many cases, workers operate within what might be called “precarious freedom”—a form of autonomy that exists without the protections or predictability of standard employment.

A question about fairness is at the center of this paradox. Algorithms assign tasks, assess performance, and decide on rewards and punishments, but these systems are not value-neutral. They reproduce assumptions, incentives, and hierarchies that human developers embedded in their design. Workers complain that they cannot correct mistakes that algorithms make—or appeal automated decisions that agentic AI systems make. At organizations that implement analytics, AI, and automation, accountability shifts from human oversight to data-driven decision-making, and the principles of fairness, transparency, and trust become harder to sustain.

As the platform economy grows, it holds both a promise of innovation and a tension between leaders and workers as the latter often feel that their labor is exploited. It promises opportunity but often at the cost of stability and predictability. It scales an innovative business model but sometimes erodes connection between leaders, managers, and stakeholders, including customers and employees. It delivers efficiency but rarely equity or engagement.

The challenge for 2027 and beyond is not grappling with the question of whether platform economies define the future of work—they already do. Rather, the real question is whether such a future can be made sustainable, appealing, and fair for all stakeholders. Finding this balance will require more than technological progress; the need of the hour is for institutional innovation and business leaders to think about more than efficiency and the bottom line. Regulatory frameworks, organizational ethics, mission and purpose, corporate social responsibility, and human-centered design must evolve to ensure that the benefits of platform economies are distributed more equitably as these economies grow in market share and profitability.

The next wave of the platform revolution needs to be about redefining what responsible work looks like in a digital era and not about replacing humans with algorithms. Freedom and fairness must evolve together—or neither will last.

Author

  • Damla Köroğlu Ünver

    Academy of Management Member Damla Köroğlu Ünver   of Istanbul University in Türkiye earned a Ph.D. in management and organizations from Istanbul University and completed a minor in psychology at Hacettepe University. Her work brings together organizational behavior, psychology, and management to explore how individuals and organizations adapt to technological and social change.
    Her research interests include the future of work, AI, digital labor platforms, organizational behavior, diversity, equity, and inclusion, employee well-being, behavioral decision-making, and entrepreneurship. Her recent research examines algorithmic management, human-AI collaboration, and the changing nature of employment relationships, with a particular focus on workers’ experiences, identities, and psychological contracts.

    View all posts
Click here for sharing