Submitting to
Academy of Management Journal
Academy of Management Journal
Author Guidelines
When submitting to Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), authors should present empirical research that advances management theory and informs practice. Submissions must offer strong empirical and theoretical contributions and clearly demonstrate their significance to the field.
AMJ welcomes all empirical methods—qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and mixed methods—and favors studies that test, extend, or build robust theoretical frameworks while addressing issues of high importance to management. The journal is not limited by discipline, level of analysis, or national context.
What to Know Before Submitting to AMJ
Submissions should present bold, original research that offers meaningful new implications or insights for management theory. This can include challenging established views, building theory inductively, providing first empirical tests, conducting meta-analyses with theoretical impact, or offering constructive replications that clarify a theory’s scope.
Articles must be relevant to practice, identify a compelling management issue supported by a strong theoretical framework, and clearly define specialized terms or methods.
Authors should ensure their work appeals to AOM’s diverse readership by demonstrating the broader relevance of specialized research, avoiding jargon, and contributing significantly to the field’s understanding of the topic.
Getting Started
The below video provides helpful information about submitting to AMJ.
Criteria for Publication
When submitting to AMJ, please keep in mind that AMJ publishes articles that make strong empirical, theoretical, and practical contributions to the field of management.
Empirical Contributions
Because empirical contributions are difficult to revise after data collection, authors should ensure research designs and instruments are sound before beginning their studies. Submissions without a substantial empirical component will not be reviewed.
Theoretical Contributions
Theoretical contributions should provide meaningful new insights, such as challenging established views, building theory inductively, offering first empirical tests, conducting meta-analyses with theoretical implications, or clarifying a theory’s boundaries through constructive replication. Methodological papers are welcome if they include both theoretical and empirical contributions.
Practical Relevance
Practical relevance is essential. Authors should clearly identify a compelling management issue and a strong theoretical framework for addressing it, specifying implications for practice whenever possible.
Articles must be accessible to AMJ’s broad readership. Authors should make the relevance of specialized research clear, avoid jargon, define technical terms, and explain analytic techniques. Manuscripts are evaluated for their contribution-to-length ratio and should be concise without sacrificing clarity. Typically, papers should not exceed 40 double-spaced pages (Times New Roman 12-point font, one-inch margins, inclusive of all content). Longer manuscripts may be considered when warranted, but incorrectly prepared papers may be returned for revision before review.
Where to Submit Other Types of Articles
Purely conceptual papers should be directed to Academy of Management Review; work on management education to Academy of Management Learning & Education; evidence-based articles without a primary theoretical focus to Academy of Management Perspectives. Responses or commentaries will be considered only if they include an independent empirical contribution and will undergo peer review.
Style Guide, AI Policy, and Ethics
Submitting to AMJ: The Review Process
The AMJ review process is conducted in various stages before a decision is reached.
Desk decisions. When a manuscript is first received, the editor completes a preliminary screening of a manuscript to assess the degree to which it:
(1) Fits the criteria described in AMJ’s Mission Statement and Information for Contributors; and
(2) Possesses at least a minimal likelihood of being favorably evaluated by AMJ’s reviewers.
Submissions that fail to satisfy one or both of those criteria may be returned to the authors as a desk decision, sometimes in the form of a desk reject and sometimes in the form of a desk edit.
Normal review process. For each manuscript that passes the initial review stage, the editor assigns an action editor (either him or herself or an associate editor or guest editor) and three reviewers. The action editor then makes publication decisions about the manuscript. These decisions are made in conjunction with recommendations provided by members of the Journal’s Editorial Board or other qualified reviewers.
All submissions are blind-reviewed and may be returned for revision if they are prepared in a way that compromises blind review.
AMJ strives to provide constructive and developmental feedback to authors within 60 days. However, the initial quality of the manuscript can dramatically influence both the efficiency and effectiveness of the review process. A well-developed manuscript is easier to review and will likely receive more positive feedback. Manuscripts should always be reviewed by your scholarly colleagues prior to submission to AMJ.
Prepare manuscripts in accordance with the AMJ Style Guide for Authors. Manuscripts that are prepared incorrectly tend to be less favorably reviewed, and may be returned to the author for revision prior to submission to the full review process.
Submission of a manuscript to AMJ also carries an implicit quid pro quo: the author’s willingness to review for AMJ and provide feedback through the peer review process for their colleagues. Authors who submit manuscripts to AMJ for review are expected to reciprocate by reviewing for AMJ if called upon to do so.